|
|
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF VOCATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES |
|
|||||||
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDES
Available in PDF Format for Printing
|
|||||||||
|
The Guides are intended to be used to support a process that includes:
|
|||||||||
This document contains hypertext links or pointers to information created and maintained by other public and private organizations. These links and pointers are provided for the user's convenience. The Education Department does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this outside information. Further, the inclusion of links or pointers to particular items in hypertext is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse any views expressed, or products or services offered, on these outside sites, or the organizations sponsoring the sites.
The State Education Department grants permission to New York State public schools, approved private schools and nonprofit organizations to copy this for use as a review and quality improvement guide. This material may not otherwise be reproduced in any form or by any means or modified without the written permission of the New York State Education Department. For further information, contact the VESID Special Education Office at (518) 473-2878 or write to VESID, Room 1624 One Commerce Plaza, Albany, New York 12234
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Definition: School-wide PBS is a systems approach to discipline
that emphasizes prevention and data-based decision-making to both reduce problem
behavior and improve academic performance.
Key Question: Does the school have a consistent
and comprehensive school-wide behavioral program in place?
|
Indicator: School-Wide Discipline System |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: School-Based Team |
||
|
There is a school-based team with oversight responsibility for the school’s discipline system. |
|
Team roster, meeting minutes, training schedule, evaluation report, written action plan |
|
Component 2: Political Support & Visibility at School level |
||
|
The school-wide discipline system is supported by and is a priority for school staff. |
|
Staff survey, school improvement plan, school code of conduct, team membership, funding records, staffing/time allocations |
|
Component 3: School-Wide Behavioral Expectations |
||
|
The school has a limited number of expectations for student behavior which are positively stated. |
|
Team documents, school code of conduct, posters in school, expectations Matrix |
|
Component 4: Instruction in Behavior |
||
|
All students are taught behavioral expectations. |
|
Lesson plans, schedule for teaching, Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET) results/ Survey |
|
Component 5: School-Wide Behavioral Expectations |
||
|
Students are acknowledged for demonstrating expected behaviors. |
|
Acknowledgement menu, data report, observation, school records |
|
Component 6: Consistent Behavioral Consequences |
||
|
Students are acknowledged for demonstrating expected behaviors. |
|
Teacher handbook, student handbook, interview/survey, school reports, lesson plans, discipline data |
|
Component 7: Data Collection and Analysis |
||
|
Data on student behavior are collected and used to inform and improve the behavioral system. |
|
Discipline referral form, school data reports, monthly data reports, team minutes, action plans |
|
Component 8: On-going staff development |
||
|
All staff understand and implement the school-wide discipline system with fidelity. |
|
Training enrollment records, coach report, team action plan, faculty meeting minutes, staff surveys, teacher acknowledgement menu, training materials |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Does the district support the school in effective
implementation of its positive discipline system?
|
Indicator: District Level Support |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: District-Level Leadership Team |
||
|
Schools receive support at the district level in implementing positive school-wide discipline systems. |
|
Team roster, attendance, meeting minutes, training dates, written action plan |
|
Component 2: Political Support & Visibility at District level |
||
|
The school community is aware of and supports the school’s discipline system. |
|
District strategic plan/ PDP, PTA minutes/ agenda, district newsletter, Board minutes, newspaper articles |
|
Component 3: Professional Development & Technical Assistance |
||
|
The district provides professional development and technical assistance to support schools. |
|
Trainer agreements, training schedule, sign-ins, PDP/ QIP, coach meeting minutes, handbook/materials |
|
Component 4: District Program Evaluation |
||
|
The district evaluates and helps to improve school-based systems of discipline. |
|
VADIR report, suspension/dropout records program evaluation report, district strategic plan |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Do classroom behavioral support
systems relate directly to the school-wide behavioral support system? Do
non-classroom behavioral support systems relate directly to the school-wide
behavioral system?
(See VESID Quality Indicator on Classroom Management for
more in-depth indicators)
| Indicator: Behavior Management | ||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Classroom Management |
||
|
Effective classroom management strategies are used in all classrooms. |
|
Posters of class rules, teacher/student interview, lesson plans,
student interviews, |
|
Component 2: Non-Classroom Behavioral Supports |
||
|
Effective management strategies are used in non-classroom settings. |
|
Posters in each setting, lesson plans, office discipline referral forms, student/staff interviews, training schedule, sign-ins, staff meeting minutes |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Does the school have a consistent, high quality
small group intervention for at risk students? Is there a consistent and
comprehensive system for developing and implementing interventions for students
with significant individualized behavioral support needs?
(See VESID Quality Indicators on Targeted Small Group Behavioral
Interventions and on Intensive Individualized
Behavioral Interventions for more in-depth indicators)
| Indicator: Interventions for At-Risk Students | ||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: High Quality Small Group Intervention |
||
|
Evidence-based small group interventions for behaviorally at-risk students are in place. |
|
At risk criteria policies, monitors are identified, training dates, written description of secondary strategies, written action plan |
|
Component 2: Intensive Individualized Behavioral Interventions |
||
|
Evidence-based intensive individualized interventions for students with chronic and severe behavioral difficulties are in place. |
|
Behavioral incident reports, team roster, staff memos, FBAs, BIPs & teacher reports, anecdotal records |
Selected Bibliography
Albin, R.W., Dunlap, G., & Lucyshyn, J.M. (2002). Collaborative
research with families on positive behavior support. In J. Lucyshyn, G. Dunlap, & Albin,
R.W. (Eds), Families and positive behavior support: Addressing problem behaviors
in family contexts (pp. 373-389). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. How
to apply PBS principles in families.
Anderson, C. M., and Kincaid, D. (2005). Applying
Behavior Analysis to School Violence and Discipline Problems: Schoolwide Positive
Behavior Support—(abstract). The Behavior Analyst,
28 (1).
Bohanon-Edmonson, H., Flannery, K.B., Eber, L. & Sugai,
G. (2005). Positive
Behavior Support in High Schools: Monograph from the 2004 Illinois High School
Forum of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Summary
of findings from a roundtable on implementation of PBS in high schools (118
pgs).
Bohanon, H., Fenning, P., Carney, K., Minnis-Kim, M.J., Anderson-Harris,
S., Moroz, K.B., Hicks, K.J., Kaspar, B., Culos, C., Sailor, W., & Spigott,
T.D. (2006). Schoolwide
application of Positive Behavior Support in an urban high school: A case study (abstract). Journal
of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(3), pp. 131-145. After
somewhat dry start on research methodology, touches on the trickery parts of
PBS in an urban setting with older students.
Brophy, J.E. (1986a). Classroom management techniques. Education and Urban
Society, 18(2), 182-194. Literature review identifying components
of effective classroom management.
Cameron, J., & Pierce, W.D. (1994). Reinforcement,
reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational
Research, 64(3), 363-423. Meta-analysis showing that providing
incentives does not decrease intrinsic motivation of students.
Clonan, S.M., McDougal, J.L., Clark, K. & Davison, S.
(2007). Use
of office discipline referrals in school-wide decision making: A practical
example (abstract). Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), pp.
19-27. Provides overview of PBIS and then focuses on how office
discipline data can be used with emphasis on role of school psychologist.
Clonan, S.M., Lopez, F., Rymarchyk, G., & Davison, S. (2004?). School-wide
positive behavior support: Implementation and evaluation at two urban elementary
schools. Persistently Safe Schools: The National
Conference of the HAMILTON FISH INSTITUTE ON SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY VIOLENCE. Evaluation
of PBS at two urban elementary schools.
Colvin, G., Sugai, G., Good, R., & Lee, Y. (1997). Effect
of active supervision and precorrection on transition behaviors of elementary
students. School
Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344-363. Focuses on two aspects
of the PBS framework—monitoring and pre-teaching behavior to prevent
problems.
Ford, L & Amaral, D. (2006) Research
on Parent Involvement: Where We’ve Been and Where We Need to Go.
Report from British Columbia Educational Leadership Research. Literature
review.
Freeman, R., Eber, L., Anderson, C., Irvin, L., Horner, R,
Bounds, M. & Dunlap,
G. (2006). Building
inclusive school cultures using school-wide positive behavior support: Designing
effective individual support systems for students with significant disabilities. Research & Practice
for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(1), pp. 4-17. PBS
as tool to develop fully inclusive schools with good descriptions of the 3
tiers of PBS.
Homer, R. H., Sugai, G., Eber, L., Phillips, D., & Lewandowski
(2004). Illinois Positive
Behavioral Interventions and Supports Project: 2002-2003 progress report. Chicago,
IL: ISBE EBD/PBIS Network. Evaluation of statewide implementation
of PBIS in Illinois.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Horner, H. F. (2000). A
school-wide approach to student discipline (abstract). The School Administrator,
2(57), 20-23. Includes a discussion of the importance of
administrator involvement.
Horner R.H., Todd A.W., Lewis-Palmer T., Irvin L.K., Sugai
G. & Boland J.B. (2003). The School-Wide Evaluation Tool
(SET): A Research Instrument for Assessing School-Wide Positive Behavior Support. Journal
of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), pp. 3-12. Description
of the SET, tool for formal evaluations of PBS in a school.
Irvin, L.K., Tobin, T.J, Sprague, J.R., Sugai, G., & Vincent,
C.G. (2004). Validity
of office discipline referral measures as indices of school-wide behavioral
status and effects of school-wide behavioral interventions (abstract). Journal
of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(3), 131-147. Emphasizes
importance of data collection/analysis.
Lewis, T.J. & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective
behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management (abstract). Focus
on Exceptional Children. Includes research review, but most
useful part is middle section on non-classroom settings, with good examples
of expectations and implementation steps in hallway, playground, assemblies
and cafeteria.
Luiselli, J.K., Putnam, R.F., Handler, M.W., & Feinberg,
A.B. (2005). Whole-school
positive behavior support: Effects on student discipline problems and academic
performance (abstract). Educational Psychology, 25 (2/3), 183-198. Overview
of all components of a school-wide behavior support system.
Netzel, D.M. & Eber, L. (2003). Shifting
from reactive to proactive discipline in an urban school district: A
change of focus through PBIS implementation (abstract). Journal
of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(2), pp. 71-79. Case
study of an urban school district’s implementation of PBIS with some
clear specific examples of steps taken.
Oswald, K., Safran, S., & Johanson, G. (2005). Preventing
trouble: Making schools safer using positive behavior supports. Education
and Treatment of Children, 28(3), 265-278. Overall description
of all components of PBIS program
Putnam, R.F., Horner, R.H. & Algozzine, R. (2006). Academic
achievement and the implementation of schoolwide behavior support. Positive
Behavior Interventions & Support Newsletter, 3(1).
Scott, T.M. & Martinek, G. (2006). Coaching
positive behavior support in school settings: Tactics and data-based
decision making (abstract). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,
8(3), pp. 165-173. Good general description of PBS and good
specific description of one way a coach might function.
Skiba, R.J. (2000). Zero
tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. Policy
Research Report #SRS2, Indiana Education Policy Center, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln. Research report on lack of evidence on
effectiveness of zero tolerance policies.
Skiba, R.J., Michale, R.S., & Nardo, A.C. (2000). Sources
of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Policy
Research Report #SRS, Indiana Education Policy Center, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln. Explores factors contributing to disproportionate
representation of minority students in school discipline procedures.
Smallwood, D. (2003). Defusing
violent behavior in young children: An ounce of prevention: Information
for School Principals. National Association of School Psychologist
Handout. Short, clear overview of schoolwide and individual
interventions for elementary schools.
Sugai, G., Sprague, J. R., Horner, R. H., & Walker, H. M. (2000). Preventing
school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor
school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral
Disorders, 8, 94-101. Emphasizes importance of
data collection/analysis.
Taylor-Greene, S.J., & Kartub, D.T (2000). Durable implementation of school-wide
behavior support: The high five program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(4),
233-235. Description of a specific PBIS program in an elementary
school with 5 expectations that had great results in ODRs for 5 years running.
Tobin, T. J., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Sugai, G. (2002). School-wide and individualized
effective behavior support: An explanation and an example (pgs 51-75
of this 118 page document). Behavior Analyst Today, 3, pp.,
1-7Tobin, T., Sugai, G., & Colvin, G. (1996). Patterns in middle school
discipline records. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(2),
82-94. Relates PBS (EBS) to individualized student interventions.
Tobin, T., Sugai, G., & Colvin, G. (1996). Patterns in middle school discipline
records (abstract). Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(2),
82-94. Emphasizes importance of data collection/analysis.
Utley, C.A., Kozleski, E., Smith, A. & Draper, I.L. (2004). Positive
behavior support: A proactive strategy for minimizing behavior problems
in urban multicultural youth. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,
4(4), pp. 196-207. Describes how effective PBS strategies
can incorporate multicultural education.
Wilcox, H.R., Stowe, M., Raper, C. and Hedges, L.P. (2000), Public
policy foundations for positive behavioral interventions, strategies and supports. Journal
of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(4), pp. 218-230.
Walker, B., Cheney, D., Stage, S., Blum, C., & Horner, R.H. (2005). School-wide
screening and positive behavior supports: Identifying and supporting students
at risk for school failure. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,
7(4), 194-204.
Resources/Tools
Professional Development Tools from www.pbis.org
General Tools for Evaluating and Planning a School-Wide Discipline System:
Additional Data Collection/Analysis Tools
Sample Behavioral Matrices
Sample Behavioral Lesson Plans
Sample Acknowledgement Systems
Sample Behavioral Consequences
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Definition: Classroom management is all the actions teachers take to create an environment that supports academic and social-emotional learning. It includes all of the teacher’s practices related to establishing the physical and social environment of the classroom, regulating routines and daily activities, and preventing and correcting behavior.
Key Question: Do all students feel accepted
and valued in the class?
|
Indicator: Caring & Supportive Relationship with and among Students |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Positive Classroom Climate |
||
|
The teacher has created a positive, warm and accepting environment for all students in the class. |
|
Observation, lesson plans, student and teacher interviews, activity schedules |
|
Component 2: Culturally Responsive Classroom Practices |
||
|
All students feel valued and accepted by adults and peers in the classroom. |
|
Observation, lesson plans, classroom newsletters, communication logs, student and teacher interview |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Is instruction thoughtfully designed and delivered
to be relevant, appropriately challenging and engaging for all students?
|
Indicator: Instruction Designed to Optimize Learning and Engagement |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Instruction is Planned |
||
|
Lessons are carefully planned to accommodate the needs of all students. |
|
Lesson plans, alternative materials, class schedule |
|
Component 2: Instruction is Structured and Predictable |
||
|
Lessons are carefully structured and students are aware of lesson objectives and structure. |
|
Observation, student work |
|
Component 3: Instruction is Interactive and Engaging |
||
|
Teachers use multiple and varied techniques to engage students in the material in meaningful ways. |
|
Lesson plans, observation |
|
Component 4: Instruction is Direct and Explicit |
||
|
Students learn to independently use strategies that will help them to successfully acquire and retrieve learned materials. |
|
Lesson plans, observation |
|
Component 5: Learning is Actively Monitored |
||
|
Students and teachers are continually assessing effectiveness of lessons. |
|
Student work, grade books, progress monitoring data |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key Question: Are
classroom activities managed in a proactive, positive and predictable manner
so that instructional time is maximized?
|
Indicator: Classroom Managed to Support Student Engagement |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Organized Physical Setting |
||
|
Classroom is physically arranged to promote positive interactions. |
|
Posters, observation, accessibility walk-through |
|
Component 2: Behavior Expectations Established and Taught |
||
|
There is a system in place to establish and teach clear rules, procedures and consequences. |
|
Lesson plans, posters, classroom rules or behavioral matrices, observation, student interviews, classroom list of acknowledgements and consequences. |
|
Component 3: Behavior is Monitored |
||
|
The teacher actively supervises the classroom, including watching for behaviors to acknowledge and behaviors to correct. |
|
Observation |
|
Component 4: Planned Responses to Appropriate Behavior |
||
|
Students are acknowledged for demonstrating expected behaviors. |
|
Acknowledgement menu, acknowledgement data, student interviews |
|
Component 5: Planned Responses to Inappropriate Behavior |
||
|
Students clearly see the connection between the inappropriate behavior and its consequences. |
|
Office discipline referrals, behavioral data, observation, student interviews |
|
Component 6: Transitions are Managed |
||
|
Classroom transition time results in very few discipline issues, and students move to and from their activities successfully. |
|
Observation, lesson plans |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Do students receive support in learning to
manage their own behavior?
|
Indicator: Direct Instruction in Student Behavioral Self-Management |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Promotion of Self-Regulation |
||
|
Students learn to initiate, persevere and complete tasks, to monitor and change behavior, and to plan future behavior when faced with new situations. |
|
Observation, lesson plans, behavioral charts, student interviews |
|
Component 2: Promoting Thinking about Behavior |
||
|
Teacher encourages, and students engage in, systematic problem-solving about behavior. |
|
Lesson plans, observation, student interviews |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Are teachers supported in developing and implementing
effective classroom management strategies?
|
Indicator: Professional Development/District Support |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
|
||
|
Teachers are supported in developing and implementing evidence-based classroom management strategies by the district and school leadership. |
|
PDP, QIP, training schedules, school and district improvement plans |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Selected Bibliography
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for
learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational
objectives: Complete edition, New York : Longman.
Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Developing metacognition. ERIC
Clearinghouse on Information Resources.
Bondy,
E., Ross, D., Gallingane, C., & Hambacher,
E. (2007). Creating environments of success and resilience: Culturally responsive
classroom management and more. (abstract) Urban
Education, 42(4), pp. 326-348.
Colvin, G., Sugai, G., Good, R. & Lee, Y. (1997). Using active supervision
and precorrection to improve transition behaviors in an elementary school. School
Psychology Quarterly, 12, 344-363.
Colvin, G., Sugai, G. & Patching, W. (1993). Precorrection: An instructional
approach for managing predictable problem behaviors. Intervention in School
and Clinic, 28, 143-150.
Cotton, K. (1991). Close-Up #11: Teaching thinking skills. Retrieved
April 14, 2008, from Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory’s School
Improvement Research Series Web site: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/6/cu11.html
ERIC Digest #E408. (1990). Managing
Inappropriate Behavior in the Classroom. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse
on Handicapped and Gifted Children.
Evertson, C.M., Ed. & Weinstein, C.S., Ed. (2006) Handbook
of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (abstract). NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fox, L., & Garrison, S. (2003). Helping children learn to manage
their own behavior. What Works Briefs. (Report No-7). Champaign,
IL: Center on Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning, University
of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
Lewis, T., Sugai, G. & Colvin, G. (2000). The effects of pre-corrective
and active supervision on the recess behavior or elementary students. Education
and Treatment of Children, 23(2), 109-121.
Miller, G., & Hall, T. (2005). Classroom
management. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General
Curriculum.
Monroe, C. (2005). The cultural context of ‘disruptive behaviour’:
An overview of research considerations for school educators. (abstract) Improving
Schools, 8(2), pp. 153-159.
Murdick, N.L., & Petch-Hogan, B. (1996). Inclusive classroom management
using preintervention strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic,
31, 172-176.
Myles, B.S., Trautman, M.L., & Schelvan, R.L. (2004). The hidden
curriculum: practical solutions for understanding unstated rules in social
situations. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing
Co.
Oliver, R.M. & Reschly, D.J. (2007) Effective
Classroom Management: Teacher preparation and professional development. DC: National
Comprehensive Center for Teacher Development.
Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (accepted,
2008). A
review of evidence based practices in classroom management: Considerations
for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children,
OSEP.
Weinstein, C., Tomlinson-Clarkem, S. & Curran, M. (2004). Toward
a conception of culturally responsive classroom management. (abstract) Journal
of Teacher Education, 55( 1), pp. 25-38.
Resources/Tools
Classroom Management Checklists, adapted from Geoff Colvin's Classroom Strategies
Classroom Management: Self-Assessment, by George Sugai & Geoff Colvin
Reducing Problem Behaviors Through Good Academic Management: 10 Strategies, by Jim Wright:
PowerPoint: Evidence-Based Practices in Classroom Management, Brandi Simonsen, PhD: Short version; Long version:
PowerPoint: Behavior Management in Classroom Settings: Basics, Sugai and Colvin
Turning Research
into Practice (TRIP) reports from Rob March, PhD.
The
Research Literature: Classroom Management, Utah State University
PowerPoint: Culturally
Responsive Classroom Management and Organization, Elise Trumbull
Bridging Cultures in Our Schools: New Approaches that Work from WestEd Online, by Elise Trumbull, Carrie Rothstein-Fisch and Patricia M. Greenfield
Evidence-Based Practices
SOCCSS – a teaching strategy to help students function better in social situations
Power Card Strategy – strategy to help students make sense of a specific situation and engage in a targeted behavior.
Higher Order Thinking Skills Curriculum (H.O.T.S.)
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Small group intensive interventions for at-risk students (also referred to as targeted, Tier 2, or secondary interventions) are designed to build skills with a subset of students with similar behavioral needs who are not responding to the school-wide system. The interventions are part of a school-wide discipline program that emphasizes prevention and data-based decision-making to both reduce problem behavior and improve academic performance.
Key
Questions: Is there an effective school-wide positive
discipline system in place? Have resources been allocated to sustain
small group interventions; i.e., a structure to communicate and monitor implementation
and professional development?
| SGI Indicator: School/District Infrastructure | ||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: District and Administrative Support |
||
|
There is visible district and administrative support for implementing targeted small group interventions. |
|
Meeting rosters, memos, records of classroom visits, budgets, schedules, job descriptions, BOE minutes, newsletters/website |
|
Component 2: Intensification of School-Wide System |
||
|
The school-wide behavioral system is intensified for targeted students and settings. (See VESID QI Form on School-Wide PBS for Quality Indicators of a school-wide behavioral system.) |
|
School-wide program evaluation, action or implementation plan, office discipline referrals, data records, team minutes, monitoring checklists/forms |
|
Component 3: Data-Based Decision-Making |
||
|
An effective data-based decision-making process is in place. |
|
Evaluation report, team minutes |
|
Component 4: Evidence-Based Interventions |
||
|
The research and evidence base is reviewed in selecting targeted small group interventions. |
|
Web-based resources below, journal articles, team notes, data analysis reports |
|
Component 5: Integrated Delivery of Services |
||
|
Targeted small group interventions are integrated seamlessly into school-wide programs. |
|
School-wide discipline plan, QIP, district plan |
|
Component 6: On-going staff development |
||
|
There is high-quality, on-going staff development that includes technical assistance in implementing best practices. |
|
Survey results, attendance records, training evaluations, teacher report, surveys, observation checklists |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Does the school have effective, evidence-based,
targeted small group interventions in place for behaviorally at-risk students?
The following Components appear consistently in a variety
of research-based small group targeted interventions. The Look Fors are
examples of research-based activities that might be included as part of that
component.
| SGI Indicator: Evidence-Based Small Group Intervention Strategies for Students who are Behaviorally At-Risk | ||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Family/School Connection |
||
|
There are systems in place to maintain and strengthen the family/school connection. |
|
Surveys, plan sign-off, attendance and training evaluations, notes home, phone logs, service logs, meeting minutes, collaborative programs |
|
Component 2: Relationship Building |
||
|
Activities are in place that are designed to connect at-risk students to all parts of the school and community. |
|
Surveys, enrollment records, attendance |
|
Component 3: Social Skills Instruction Selected and Provided |
||
|
A research-supported social skills curriculum is taught to targeted students. |
|
Curriculum guide, lesson plans, observations, enrollment records, attendance |
|
Component 4: Academic Support |
||
|
Additional academic supports are provided to behaviorally at-risk students. |
|
Enrollment records, attendance, student work product, evaluation results, lesson plans, school plan, assessment report |
|
Component 5: Transitions Addressed |
||
|
Programs are in place to help students make successful transitions of all types. |
|
School plan, common planning schedule, meeting records, transition plans, IEPs |
|
Component 6: Effective In-School Suspension |
||
|
In-school suspension has the elements required to insure success. |
|
Program description, school plan, daily program records, lesson plans, FBAs |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Are proactive classroom
and non-classroom behavioral support systems in place to reduce need for targeted
small group interventions?
(See VESID Quality Indicator on
Classroom Management for more in-depth indicators)
| SGI Indicator: Classroom Behavioral Supports | ||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Classroom Management |
||
|
Effective classroom management strategies are used in all classrooms.
|
|
Posters of class rules, teacher/student interview, lesson plans, student interviews, office discipline referral forms, teacher/student interview, observations. |
|
Component 2: Non-Classroom Behavioral Supports |
||
|
Effective management strategies are used in all non-classroom settings.
|
|
Posters in each setting, lesson plans, office discipline referral forms, student/staff interviews, training schedule, sign-ins, staff meeting minutes |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: : Does the school have a
consistent and comprehensive system for developing and implementing interventions
for students with significant individualized behavioral support needs?
(See VESID Quality Indicators on Intensive Individualized
Behavioral Interventions for more in-depth indicators)
|
SGI Indicator: Interventions for students with chronic difficulties |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Intensive Interventions for Students with Chronic Behavioral Difficulties |
||
|
Evidence-based intensive individualized interventions for students with chronic and severe behavioral difficulties are in place. |
|
Behavioral incident reports, team roster, staff memo, FBAs, IEPs, BIPs & teacher reports, team minutes |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Selected Bibliography
Bohanon-Edmonson, H., Flannery, K.B., Eber, L. & Sugai, G. (2005). Positive
Behavior Support in High Schools: Monograph from the 2004 Illinois High School
Forum of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Chapter
8, pg 73, is on targeted Interventions and alternatives to suspension. (118
pgs).
Bost, L.W. & Riccomini, P.J. (2006). Effective
instruction: An inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention (Abstract). Remedial
and Special Education, 27(5), pp. 301-311. Review of research-supported
instructional strategies for students with disabilities, from the perspective
of dropout prevention. Appendix is particularly helpful.
Caspe, M. & Lopez, M.E. (2006). Lessons
from family-strengthening interventions: Learning from evidence-based
practice. Harvard Family Research Project, Cambridge, MA. Descriptions
of evidence-based programs for strengthening families that impact on school
performance.
Ford, L & Amaral, D. (2006) Research
on Parent Involvement: Where We’ve Been and Where We Need to Go.
Report from British Columbia Educational Leadership Research. Literature
review on parent involvement.
Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2001). “Data” need
not be a four-letter word (abstract): Using data to improve schoolwide
discipline. Beyond Behavior, 11(1), 20-22. Describes a process
by which a school can begin to use behavioral data effectively.
Kennelly, L. & Monrad, M. (2007). Approaches
to dropout prevention: Heeding early warning signs with appropriate interventions. National High
School Center at the American Institutes for Research, US Dept of Education.
Landrum T.J., Tankersley, M & Kauffman, J.M. (2003). What is special
about Special Education for students with emotional or behavioral disabilities? Journal
of Special Education, 37(3), pp. 1480156.
Lehr, C.A. (2004) Increasing
school completion: Learning from research-based practices that work: Research
to practice brief. Improving Secondary Education and Transition
Services through Research, 3(3).
Riccomini, P.J., Bost, L.W., Katsiyannis, A. & Zhang, D. (2005). Cognitive-behavioral
interventions: An effective approach to help students with disabilities
stay in school. National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with
Disabilities (NDPC-SD). Describes the components of cognitive-behavioral
interventions with students with disabilities.
Scott, T.M., Nelson, C.M. & Liaupsin, C.J. (2001). Effective
instruction: The forgotten component in preventing school violence (abstract). Education
and Treatment of Children, 24(3), pp 309-322. Review of
literature on effect of improving instruction on school violence.
Snyder, M. & Bambara, L. (1997). Teaching
secondary students with learning disabilities to self-manage classroom survival
skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), pp. 534-543. Describes
a multi-component self-management intervention for students with learning disabilities.
Unruh, D., Bullis, M., Todis, B., Waintrup,M. & Atkins, T. (2007). Programs
and practices for special education students in alternative education settings: Research
to practice brief. Improving Secondary Education and Transition
Services through Research, 6(1).
Woods, E.G.(2007). Reducing
the dropout rate. School Improvement Research Study: Northwest
Regional Educational Laboratory, 17, pp. 1-17.
Resources/Tools
Websites that provide on-going reviews of small group behavioral interventions
Tools for promoting educational success and reducing delinquency, (2007). National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE) and National Disability Rights Network (NDRN). Comprehensive 374 page document providing an in-depth overview of the issues, and a series of “tools for success” – best and promising practices being implemented with success throughout the country to prevent students – including those with disabilities – from being referred to the juvenile justice system due to their behavior in school. Has a chapter on Targeted Interventions
PowerPoint on Small Group Interventions
Lewis, T. Moving up the continuum: Implementing successful small group supports.
Evidence-Based Social Skills Curricula and Programs
Collaborative for Social, Academic and Emotional Learning (CASEL) Safe and Sound Guide. Side by side comparison of 80 social/emotional learning curricula in terms of program design, instructional practices, effectiveness, required implementation supports, and applicable environments.
Sugai, G. & Fuller, M. (1991) A decision model for social skills curriculum analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 33-42. Describes a process for selecting an appropriate social skills curriculum for your particular situation and group of students—good decision-making model. Abstract.
Evidence-Based Dropout Prevention and School Completion Programs
Examples of Promising Practices for Students with Severe Communication/Developmental Disabilities
Overview of research on interventions: Vermont Interagency White Paper on Autism Spectrum Disorders – review of research begins on page 30
Peer Mediation: DiSalvo, C.A & Oswald, D.P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interaction of children with autism: Consideration of peer expectancies. (Abstract) Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(4), pp. 198-207.
Pivotal Response Training: University of California San Diego Autism Research Program: Brief description.
Social Stories: Sansosti, F. J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Kincaid, D. (2004). A research synthesis of social story interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. (Abstract) Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 19, 194-204
Video Modeling: Delano, M.E. (2007). Video modeling interventions for individuals with autism. (Abstract). Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), pp. 33-42.
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Definition: Individualized Intensive Interventions
focus on addressing the needs of students who exhibit recurring problem behaviors
that are not sufficiently addressed by a school’s broader behavioral
systems. The interventions are developed for individual students, but
are most effective when they work in conjunction with existing systems (i.e.,
positive school-wide, classroom, and small-group behavioral supports). Individualized
Intensive Interventions are designed by a comprehensive team to thoroughly
analyze, address, and monitor the needs of students with these more severe
or chronic behaviors, and are most often developed in the form of Functional
Behavioral Assessments (FBAs) and Behavioral Intervention Plans (BIPs).
Key Question: Does the school have a consistent
effective school-wide discipline system, with sufficient allocation of resources
to include an efficient system for addressing the needs of students with
severe or chronic behavioral problems?
(See VESID Quality Indicator on School-Wide Positive Behavioral
Systems for more in-depth indicators)
|
Indicator: School Infrastructure |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: |
||
|
There is an effective positive school-wide discipline system in place. |
|
Written, school-wide discipline procedures, meeting rosters, memos, records of classroom visits, budgets, schedules ,job descriptions, plan description, IST or referral records |
|
Component 2: Professional Development |
||
|
Staff are trained in effective intensive individual behavioral interventions. |
|
Attendance records, training evaluations, teacher reports, surveys, observation checklists |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Are proactive classroom behavioral support
systems in place to reduce the need for small group and individualized interventions?
(See VESID Quality Indicator on Classroom Management for
more in-depth indicators)
|
Indicator: Behavior Management |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Classroom Management |
||
|
Effective classroom management strategies are used in all classrooms. |
|
|
|
Component 2: Non-Classroom Behavioral Supports |
||
|
Effective management strategies are used in non-classroom settings. |
|
|
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key Question: Does the school have a consistent,
high quality system for small group intervention for at risk students?
(See VESID Quality Indicator on Targeted Small Group Behavioral
Interventions for more in-depth indicators)
|
Indicator: Interventions for At-Risk Students |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: High Quality Small Group Intervention |
||
|
Evidence-based small group interventions for behaviorally at-risk students are in place. |
|
At risk criteria policies, monitors are identified, training dates, written description of secondary strategies, written action plan |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Do teams identify the problem behavior(s)
of students with chronic difficulties in concrete, measurable terms? Do
they determine why the student engages in problem behaviors that impede learning
and how the environment is related to the behavior(s)?
Note: In regulations, FBAs and BIPs should be considered for a student with a disability when:
|
Indicator: Developing Intensive Individualized Behavioral Interventions: Functional Behavioral Assessments |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: FBA Team Composition & Assessment Process |
||
|
FBAs are comprehensive and incorporate information from multiple individuals and sources. |
|
FBA team list, FBA, survey, implementation fidelity, team interview, team notes, BIP, defined behavior in FBA, copy of data collection tools/summary of data, progress monitoring report at least monthly (dated) |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
Component 2: Baseline is established |
||
|
The FBA includes baseline data. |
|
Copies of data collection tools/summary of data, IEP |
|
||
|
||
|
Component 3: Contextual Factors: Factors Influencing Behavior |
||
|
Factors that maintain the problem behavior are identified. |
|
FBA, record review, Interview |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
Component 4: Hypothesis development |
||
|
The function of the behavior is identified. |
|
FBA |
|
||
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Key
Question: Do teams develop intervention plans that are
measurable, that identify and teach replacement behaviors, and include supports
and proactive strategies to prevent problem behavior from occurring?
|
Indicator: Developing Effective Behavior Intervention Plans |
||
|
Quality Indicator |
Description/Look Fors: |
Comments/Evidence |
|
Component 1: Behavior Intervention Plan |
||
|
Comprehensive BIPs are developed based on the FBAs, and are implemented with fidelity. |
|
BIP linked to hypothesis, team membership/participation, BIP, plan is implemented, progress monitoring data |
|
Component 2: Replacement Behaviors |
||
|
Behaviors are identified and taught that are intended to replace the problem behavior. |
|
FBA/BIP, progress monitoring data |
|
Component 3: Consequences |
||
|
The consequences of the behavior are managed in order to decrease problem behavior and increase expected behavior. |
|
FBA, BIP, IEP |
|
Component 4: Plan for Teaching Replacement Behavior |
||
|
Replacement behaviors are explicitly taught. |
|
Survey, BIP, progress monitoring data |
|
Component 5: Supports to facilitate success |
||
|
Proactive strategies are used and modifications are made to the plan as needed. |
|
BIP, progress monitoring data, survey, classroom observation, teacher interview |
| Component 6: Monitoring and Evaluation of Plan | ||
| Data are collected and analyzed on an on-going basis to monitor the implementation and assess the effectiveness of the BIP. |
|
BIP, CSE/CPSE Minutes, IEP (PLEP) |
|
QUALITY INDICATOR REVIEW AND RESOURCE GUIDE |
Resources/Tools
Regulations
VESID Behavioral Regulations and other NYS Behavior related publications – FBA, BIP
School-wide Positive Behavioral Systems
PBIS.org – an OSEP resource for school-wide positive discipline systems. Contains many tools including the Effective Behavior Survey (EBS) and other surveys and rating scales
FBA
FACTS (Functional
Assessment Checklists for Teachers and Staff)
Two page interview used by school personnel who are building behavior plans. It
is an efficient strategy for initial functional behavioral assessment and is
completed by people who know the student best. It can be completed in
a short period of time.
Schwab
Learning Functional Assessment Behavior Tools
This website provides a variety of forms to
assist teams with Functional Behavior Assessment
Learnet – What Problems
are Seen?
Provides information on common causes for problem behavior (hypothesis), how
to organize observations to confirm hypothesis, and prevention strategies. Focus
is on behavior issues commonly seen in students with TBI, however much of the
information can be applied to other students with similar behavioral issues.
Architext
Behavior Action Planner
Computer program to help teams write and monitor Functional Behavior Assessments,
Behavior Intervention Plans and Manifest Determinations. Free 30 day
demo program available.
Behavioral Notes
Web based tool for documenting and analyzing behavior.
Problem Behavior Questionnaire, Lewis, T.J., Scott, T.M., Sugai, G. (1994) The problem behavior questionnaire: A teacher based instrument to develop function hypothesis of problem behavior in general education settings. Diagnostique, 10:103-115.
Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice. (1998). Addressing student problem behavior—Part II: conducting a functional behavioral assessment.
Behavior Intervention Planning: Using the Functional Behavior Assessment Data.(User’s Guide with interactive CD) Longmont, CO:Sopris West. Scott, T., Liaupson, C., Nelson, C.M. (2001)
Motivation
Assessment Scale
A short form free online for teams to use to determine function of behavior.