Overview of the State Performance Plan Development
See Overview of the State Performance Plan Development
|
Indicator #1: Percent of youth with individualized education programs (IEPs) graduating from high school with a regular diploma compared to percent of all youth in the State graduating with a regular diploma.
(20 U.S.C. 1416 (a)(3)(A))|
Measurement: Measurement for youth with IEPs should be the same measurement as for all youth. Explain calculation.
New York State’s Measurement: Percent of “graduation-rate cohort” of students with disabilities who graduate with a high school diploma (Regents or local diploma) within four years of first entering 9th grade or for ungraded students with disabilities, within four years of becoming 17 years of age.
NYS will use the same measurements as used for accountability reporting under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).
The number of students in the “graduation rate cohort” who earn a high school diploma as of August 31 of the fourth year divided by the total number of students in the graduation rate cohort, expressed as a percent.
The graduation-rate cohort includes all students in the accountability cohort plus all students excluded from that accountability cohort solely because they transferred to a program leading to a high school equivalency diploma (General Education Development (GED) program). The final date used to determine the members of the graduation-rate cohort is August 31 of the fourth year after a student first entered 9th grade. For example, graduation-rate cohort membership would be determined on August 31, 2004 for a student who entered grade nine for the first time in the 2000-01 school year.
2000 District Accountability Cohort. The 2000 district accountability cohort consists of all students, regardless of their current grade status, who were enrolled in a district school or placed by the district CSE or a district official in an out-of-district placement on October 2, 2002 (BEDS[1] day) and met one of the following conditions:
The Department will exclude the following students when reporting data on the 2000 district accountability cohort:
Anticipated Change in
definition of 2003 Graduation-Rate Cohort . Graduation rate of
this cohort will be determined as of August 31, 2007:
1. enrolled in ninth grade (anywhere) for the first time in a particular year (year 1) or, for ungraded students with disabilities, attained age 17 during that school year, AND 2. were enrolled in the district/school for at least five continuous months during year 1, 2, 3, or 4 of high school (excluding July and August). OR 3. were enrolled for less than five months and reason for ending enrollment was “dropped out” or transferred to a GED program and the student’s previous enrollment record in the district (assuming one exists):
The only students who are excluded from the cohort are students who transfer to another diploma-granting program, leave the U.S., transferred by court order, or die.
|
In New York State, a regular diploma is defined as a local or Regents diploma, including a Regents diploma with advanced designation requirements. The course work for high school graduation requirements may be found at:
In 2005, the Board of Regents approved policy to phase in more challenging diploma requirements over the next few years. The following chart displays the NYS diploma requirements that will be phased in over the next four years.
|
Entering Freshman Class |
Local Diploma Requirements |
Regents Diploma Requirements |
Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation Requirements |
|
2005 |
Score 65 or above on 2 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 3 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
|
2006 |
Score 65 or above on 3 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 2 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
|
2007 |
Score 65 or above on 4 required Regents exams and score 55 or above on 1 required Regents exam. Earn 22 units of credit |
Score 65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
|
2008 |
|
Score 65 or above on 5 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
Score 65 or above on 8 required Regents exams. Earn 22 units of credit. |
The safety net allows eligible students who fail a Regents examination required for graduation to meet the requirement for a local diploma by passing the Regents competency test(s) (RCT), or an approved RCT alternative, in that subject. The student may take the RCT before or after taking the Regents examination. The safety net is available to:
The RCT safety net for students with disabilities will continue to be available for students entering grade 9 prior to September 2010. Students using this safety net will be eligible to receive a local diploma. Students with disabilities may also graduate with a local diploma if they score between 55 and 64 on the required Regents exams.
Baseline Data for 2000 Graduation-Rate Cohort as of August 31, 2004. This is FFY 2004 data for the 2004-05 school year.
Fifty-three (53) percent of youth with IEPs in the 2000 graduation-rate cohort graduated from high school within four years (as of August) compared to 77 percent of all students in that cohort. The graduation rate cohort is the official cohort for accountability under NCLB.
Forty-six (46) percent of youth with IEPs in the 2000 total cohort graduated from high school within four years (as of June) compared to 67 percent of all students in that cohort. The “total cohort” includes more students than the graduation-rate cohort and the rules for being assigned to this cohort are similar to what the rules will be for the graduation–rate cohort beginning with students who entered 9th grade or for ungraded students with disabilities who became 17 years of age in the 2003-04 school year.
Discussion of Baseline Data
NYS is following the performance of two cohorts
until the definition of the graduation-rate cohort is revised to be similar
to the definition of the total cohort. This is expected to occur with the
2003 graduation-rate cohort. The graduation-rate cohort will continue to
include graduates as of August, unlike the total cohort results presented in
this SPP, which include graduates as of June. The graduation-rate cohort is
the official cohort of the State for accountability under NCLB, however,
VESID has focused its school improvement activities by using data for the
total cohort because the total cohort includes more students and is similar
to how the graduation-rate cohort will be revised beginning with the 2003
cohort.
The tables below provide several years of data for the two cohorts. The graduation rate for students with disabilities in the 2000 graduation-rate cohort was 53 percent, lower than the graduation rates of the 1999 and 1998 graduation-rate cohorts. However, it should be noted that each year, more students with disabilities were included in the cohort. The 2000 graduation-rate cohort, for example, had 18,909 students with disabilities or 32 percent more students with disabilities than in the 1998 graduation-rate cohort with 14,306 students with disabilities. The increase in the number of students with disabilities in the graduation-rate cohort is indicative of better understanding among school districts of reporting requirements and also to some changes in the definitions of these cohorts. For the definition of each year’s accountability cohort and graduation-rate cohort, see the 2005-06 STEP reporting manual at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/STEP/2006/STEPManual-2006.doc and the Student Information Reporting System (SIRS) User Manual at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/SIRS/documentation/UserManual.doc. The graduation rate of the 2001 total cohort was lower than the graduation rate of the 2000 total cohort; however, the 2001 total cohort had 26,281 students with disabilities compared to 21,262 students with disabilities in the 2000 total cohort or 24 percent more students with disabilities. The additional students in the 2001 total cohort are reflective of improvements in the State’s system of data collection that captures the results of more students, especially students who drop out of school, as well as a better understanding among school districts of reporting requirements.
The data for each graduation-rate cohort includes the summer graduates, as of August 31. The data for each total cohort includes graduates as of June 30. The years that are highlighted in the tables below represent the base year data for New York State. New York is revising its targets for the students with disabilities graduation rate to reflect the total cohort data. Once the total cohort data includes graduates as of August, NYS will consider revising its targets again for subsequent years.
|
Cohort Year |
All Students |
Students with Disabilities |
||
|
|
# in Cohort |
Graduation Rate |
# in Cohort |
Graduation Rate |
|
1998 |
165,226 |
77% |
14,306 |
55% |
|
1999 |
173,978 |
76% |
15,056 |
58% |
|
2000 (old baseline) |
179,092 |
77% |
18,909 |
53% |
Total Cohort, As of June 30, Four Years Later
|
Cohort Year |
All Students |
Students with Disabilities |
||
|
|
# in Cohort |
Graduation Rate |
# in Cohort |
Graduation Rate |
|
2000 |
199,312 |
67% |
21,262 |
46% |
|
2001 (new baseline) |
212,135 |
66.1% |
26,281 |
37.9% |
Note: The data and projected targets presented in the 2004 APR were based on the annual exiters of students with disabilities who earned a local, Regents and High School Equivalency (HSE) diploma as a percentage of the total number of students with disabilities who earned a local, Regents, HSE and IEP diploma or who reached maximum age. These data did not consider the number of years it took to graduate nor were students with disabilities who dropped out of school included in the calculation. In addition, these data were not compared to all students or general education students.
Measurable and Rigorous Targets
|
FFY |
Measurable and Rigorous Target |
|
2005 (2005-06) (2002 total cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school within four years as of June with a regular high school diploma will be 37 percent. |
|
2006* (2006-07) (2003 total cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular high school diploma within four years as of June will be 37 percent. |
|
2007 (2007-08) (2004 cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs
graduating from high school with a regular high school diploma
within four years as of June will be 38 percent. |
|
2008 2008-09 (2005 cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs
graduating from high school with a regular high school diploma
within four years as of June will be 44 percent. |
|
2009 2009-10 (2006 cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs
graduating from high school with a regular high school diploma
within four years as of June will be 49 percent. |
|
2010 2010-11 (2007 cohort) |
The percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular high school diploma within four years as of June will be 52 percent. |
|
Activity |
Timelines | Resources |
|
Beginning in 2006-07: School districts with graduation rates of higher than 18.5 percent, but less than or equal to 35 percent were identified as districts “in need of assistance.” School districts with graduation rates of 18.5 percent or less were identified as “districts in need of intervention.” Each school district, as a result of this designation, was required to engage in one or more of the following activities to improve its graduation rates:
|
2006-11 |
Special Education Quality Assurance (SEQA) Regional Offices 42 Special Education Training and Resource Centers (SETRC)
For schools also identified under NCLB: 7 Regional School Support Centers (RSSC) - RSSC includes a full-time special education specialist on staff funded by IDEA discretionary funds |
|
Beginning in 2006-07, conduct “IDEA Effective Instructional Practices” focused reviews of school districts identified as in need of intervention (see above). The review protocol targets requirements most directly related to improved instructional practices, with emphasis on:
|
2006-11 |
SEQA Regional Offices 42 SETRCs
|
| Conduct focused “Exiting/Transition” monitoring reviews of selected school districts with graduation rates below the State targets. School districts experiencing a higher dropout and/or lower graduation rate for students with disabilities are targeted for the exiting/transition review. | 2005-11 |
SEQA Regional Offices 42 SETRCs Transition Coordination Sites (TCSs) 7 RSSC - RSSC includes a full-time special education specialist on staff funded by IDEA discretionary funds |
| Conduct focused monitoring reviews of Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) to review student access and opportunities to participate in the general education curriculum and to receive course credit to meet the graduation requirements. |
2005-11 |
SEQA Regional Offices, SETRC and RSSC |
| Develop regional workplans for each of the SEQA offices to direct SEQA resources and the VESID funded technical networks to work with low performing districts. | 2006-11 |
SEQA Regional Offices SETRC TCSs |
| Provide Quality Assurance Review grants to large city school districts to offset the costs that these school districts may incur to participate in the focused monitoring reviews. |
2005-11 |
IDEA Part B Discretionary Funds |
| Provide Quality Assurance Improvement grants to school districts to implement improvement activities identified through the focused review monitoring process. |
2005-11 |
IDEA Part B Discretionary Funds |
| Use a data-driven strategic planning model to develop annual improvement plans for the Big Four Cities (Buffalo, Syracuse, Rochester and Yonkers) and to provide coordinated technical assistance and professional development programs within the cities. | 2005-11 | Urban Initiative |
|
Provide “Destination Diploma” forums to bring together school districts with the lowest graduation rates and the highest proportion of students taking three or fewer Regents exams in four years. “Destination Diploma” is designed to create a community of professional practice among school district teams, along with State and regional technical assistance providers and professional organizations. |
2005-08 |
EMSC, SEQA, SETRC, RSSC |
| Partner with other State agencies to leverage local and State interagency funding to implement school-based collaborative efforts to improve results for students with disabilities. | 2005-11 |
Task Force on School and Community Collaboration |
| Promote implementation of Positive Behavioral Intervention and Supports (PBIS) in school districts with graduation rates below the State target. |
2005-11 |
PBIS project in collaboration with SED, NYS Office of Mental Health (OMH), NYS Department of Health (DOH), the Children’s School Health Network (CSHN) and Families Together NYS (FTNYS) |
| Support preservice and inservice staff development programs to enhance the knowledge and skills of general and special education teachers who provide instruction to students with disabilities. |
2005-08 |
Contracts using Part B IDEA Discretionary funds for: The Center for the Preparation of Educational Interpreters Bilingual Paraprofessional Certification Bilingual Personnel Development Center Bilingual Special Education Personnel Preparation United Federation of Teachers Special Education Support Program Bilingual School Psychology and Speech and Language Program Intensive Teacher Institute - Blind/Visually Impaired/Deaf/Hard of Hearing |
| Develop a network of institutions of higher education (IHEs) to enhance collaborations between school districts and IHEs to promote research based literacy instruction; positive behavioral supports and effective delivery of specially designed instruction to students with disabilities. | 2005-11 | Higher Education Support Center (HESC) -
IDEA discretionary funds |
|
Increase student with disabilities’ participation in Career and Technical Education (CTE) Programs
|
2005-11 |
SED’s web site provides information on
policy, guidance and http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/workforce/cte/cte.html
CTERC established
at the Questar III BOCES.See
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/workforce/ |
|
Promote use of high quality research-based instruction for students with disabilities
|
2005-09 | IDEA Part B Discretionary Funds |
[1] BEDS day is the first Wednesday in October and is the date that enrollment data for all students is collected in New York State.