Table of Contents - Process to Practice: A Quick Reference Guide for Committee on Special Education (CSE) Chairpersons | VESID-Special Education Home Page
DURING THE MEETING
The purpose of this section is to provide suggestions for effective practices during CSE meetings as well as the procedures that must be followed under Federal and State regulations. The period of time during the CSE meeting itself is critical to the development and implementation of effective programs for students with disabilities. Decisions made during CSE meetings should be reached by consensus. Consensus does not mean that everyone agrees with the decision, but that everyone can agree to live with it, and supports the decision. Consensus may involve setting up another meeting within a few weeks to determine whether the decision was the right one for the long term. Consensus based on full participation of all team members requires an atmosphere of respect among all members. In the event a Committee cannot reach consensus, the school district representative must ensure a final decision on IEP recommendations for the student. The CSE Chairperson also assures that all members of the CSE receive training in their roles, and that the parent of the child being discussed is fully informed so that he or she can participate as a full member of the team. This section offers guidance on best practices for districts as well as many required procedures and processes that should be in place as you plan for effective CSE meetings. Each section references a requirement on best practices immediately followed by a checklist of strategies that could be used to implement the requirement or practice. As a CSE chair, you could inventory current practices with a Y/N or simply (4 ) those items you would like to follow-up on through local planning processes.
Citations beginning with "300" refer to federal legislation (I.D.E.A.), and citations beginning with "200" refer to Part 200 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education for the State of New York. A space is provided after each "Component" for you to check whether the item is completed in your district.
DURING THE MEETING
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Participation
Membership
Eligibility
Least Restrictive Environment
Declassification
Re-Evaluation
Manifestation Determination
Amendment
Private School Placement
Discussing Evaluations
Need for Alternate Assessment
Testing Accommodations
Locally Selected Assessments
Responding to Issues and Concerns
Determining Learning Disability
Functional Behavioral Assessment
Initiation of Programs and Services
Date of Annual Review and Re-Evaluation
Present Levels of Performance
Special Considerations
Post School Outcomes
Annual Goals and Objectives
Programs, Related Services and Program Modifications
Participation in General Education and Extracurricular Activities
Transition Services
Graduation
Recommendations
Declassification
Reporting Progress to Parent
DURING THE MEETING
|
Effective Practices for CSE |
||||
|
COMPONENTS
|
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
|
b |
. |
|||
|
|
.. |
All present have nametags or tents with position identified |
These effective practices enhance participation but are not required by law or regulation. The citation covers required participants. Coffee, courtesies, comfort and coming to consensus. |
200.3(a) 300.345(a) and (c-e) |
| . |
All present are introduced using names, titles; if last names are used for staff, parental last name is used as well. Roles of each member are explained |
|||
|
. |
All present have/are offered beverages |
|||
|
. |
All seating is comfortable |
|||
|
. |
Placement of participants facilitates communication with parent/student (proximity; good eye contact; access to interpreters; no one faces glare of window, etc.) |
|||
|
A facilitator or chairperson is designated to keep the meeting on target, to keep records and minutes. If needed, an interpreter is present. |
||||
|
. |
All required members for type of meeting |
These membership considerations are required by law and regulation
If a representative of an agency does not attend, the district has documented at least two attempts to obtain their participation or recommendations in the planning process |
200.3(a-d) 300.344 (a-d) |
|
|
An agenda is developed and shared with all participants. Sufficient time is allocated for discussion and questions |
||||
|
. |
Alternative participation by individual or conference telephone call or teleconference made available as needed. All paperwork provided at meetings is also provided to remote locations |
|||
|
. |
Representatives for residential placements attend meetings as appropriate |
|||
|
. |
Appropriate representatives invited to participate in meetings to develop transition programs and/or discuss transition services. If the student is attending a private school, a representative from the private school is invited to participate. |
|||
|
COMPONENTS |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
|
b |
.. |
|||
|
. |
CSE determines continued or initial eligibility for special education programs/related services |
IEP including appropriate special education programs and/or related services developed:
|
200.4(c), 200.4 (d)(1), 300.534 (a-b), 300.535 (a-b), "Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for Students with Disabilities", revised January 2002 |
|
|
. |
Insufficient instruction in reading or math eliminated as determining factor |
|||
|
. |
Limited English Proficiency eliminated as determining factor; disability is present regardless of English proficiency |
|||
|
.. |
If the student is determined ineligible, CSE sends reasons for determination, information gleaned from evaluation and resulting recommendations to parent and building level administrator. |
|||
|
.. |
If the student is determined initially eligible or continues to be eligible, IEP is developed |
|||
|
. |
LRE means that the placement of students with disabilities in special classes, separate schools or other removal from the general education environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability is such that even with the use of supplementary aids and services, education cannot be satisfactorily achieved. Any time services are not provided to the student in the general education setting, an explanation of the extent, if any, to which the student will not participate in general education programs must be provided on the IEP. The school must have evaluation procedures to assure that students are assessed in all areas related to the suspected disability, including, where appropriate, health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, career and technical skills, communicative status, motor abilities and assistive technology. The school must have supplementary aids and services in general education classes or other education – related settings that enable students with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled students to the maximum extent appropriate in the least restrictive environment. |
LRE reinforces that special education is a service, not a place, The CSE must first consider placement in general education with appropriate support for the student and the student's teacher(s). In the case of language minority students, services in their native language should be considered
Students with disabilities should have access to and opportunities to participate in district-sponsored programs and activities, including non-academic and extra-curricular activities |
200.4 (b) |
|
|
COMPONENTS |
.. |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
b |
||||
|
.. |
The CSE makes the recommendation to declassify when student receiving special education programs/services is determined to no longer be in need of such intervention. CSE discusses declassification support services, identifying services necessary for student or teachers, the projected date of initiation, frequency, and duration of each service. |
Declassification services may not continue for more than one calendar year after the student exits special education and enters general education on a full time basis Continuation of safety net and of test accommodations is not held to one-year limit and may continue throughout student’s school career if needed. District should consider how such accommodations will be monitored in the absence of an IEP and special education follow up. If the student was exempted from the requirements of Languages Other Than English (LOTE), this may continue and should be documented on the IEP. |
200.2(b)(8), 300.534 (a and c),
"Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for Students with Disabilities", revised January 2002 |
|
COMPONENTS |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
||
|
b |
.. |
||||
|
.. |
CSE conducts reevaluation at least every three years, or prior to consideration of declassification |
Parent or district may request reevaluation sooner than three years when concerned about appropriateness of program, significant changes in student, or student’s continuing eligibility for services |
200.4(b)(4 and 5), 200.4(f) 300.533(a-b), 300.536(a-c) "Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for Students with Disabilities", revised Jan. 2002 |
||
|
. |
CSE must conduct a manifestation determination when there is a disciplinary change in placement.
|
A manifestation determination hearing is a review of the relationship between the student’s disability and the behavior subject to the disciplinary action in question. |
201.4 (a-f) 300.523(a-f) "Discipline Procedures for |
||
|
. |
CSE conducts a meeting to change any aspect of an IEP currently being implemented. A referral for a change initiates the timeline. |
A meeting should be held any time that it is determined that a change in the IEP may be appropriate. |
200.4(d) and (f) 300.343(c), |
||
*NYC: Conducted in collaboration with the Director of Pupil Personnel Services on the District level
|
COMPONENTS |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
|
b |
.. |
|||
|
Possible outcome of meeting: Discuss need for private school placement |
.. |
The evaluations necessary to describe the relevant circumstances leading up to the recommendation for placement in an approved in-state or out-of-state private school must have been completed within six months prior to the CSE’s initial recommendation for private school placement. Documentation must be submitted to SED that includes:
The Board of Education must arrange for the placement within 30 school days of the BOE’s receipt of the CSE recommendation. Where the child is determined at risk of future residential placement, the CSE must request the appropriate county or State agency to participate in the CSE meeting.
|
The recommendation to remove a child from their home should be a difficult decision, arrived at only after all possible options are exhausted. It must be based on the individual needs of the student. Approval by SED for funding must be obtained prior to placement. Appropriate STAC forms must be submitted. CSE Chairperson must assure there is an interstate compact with out-of-state school. A student in an approved private school may only be removed or transferred upon the recommendation of the CSE.
Community support services must be explored .
The CSE must make the applications to private schools and follow up with the private schools to determine acceptance/rejection. |
200.6(i)(1-5)
"Technical Assistance Manual for the Placement of School-Age Students with Disabilities in Residential Schools", January 1999 |
|
Evaluation: |
.. |
Copies of reports of evaluations conducted to determine eligibility or continuing eligibility:
|
Explanation of reports and results may be required to assure informed consent. Evaluations must be appropriate and personnel qualified when administering bilingual evaluations. |
200.4b)(6)(xii-xiii) 300.534(a)(2) "Procedural Safeguards Notice", February 2002 "Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for Students with Disabilities", revised January 2002 |
|
Assessment: |
. |
The criteria that the CSE must use to determine a student’s participation in the NYSAA are: 1. The student participating in the alternate assessment has: a severe cognitive disability, and significant deficits in communication/language, and adaptive behavior.AND 2. The student requires a highly specialized educational program that facilitates the acquisition, application and transfer of skills across natural environments (home, school community and/or workplace). AND 3. The student requires educational support systems, such as: assistive technology, personal care services, health/medical services, or behavioral intervention. |
The CSE must indicate if the student will not participate in particular State or local assessments (or part of an assessment), why the assessment is not appropriate and how the student will be assessed. |
200.4(d)(2)(vi) 300.347(a)(5)(ii) "The State Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe
Disabilities"
|
|
COMPONENTS |
.CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
| b | ||||
|
.. |
Testing accommodations must be used consistently in the educational program and in the administration of district-wide assessments of student achievement. |
Consult February 2002 SED field memo for allowable testing accommodations for students with disabilities on the New York State elementary and intermediate-level tests in English Language Arts and mathematics effective with the beginning of the 2002-2003 school year. |
200.4(d)(2)(xiii) "Changes in Allowable Testing Accommodations on Elementary and
Intermediate-Level Tests" |
|
|
Assessment: Determining the need for locally selected assessments |
.. |
Students with disabilities must participate in the State and local assessment program and the CSE may not exempt any student from such participation. CSEs may recommend participation in a locally selected assessment in lieu of a State assessment for certain students with disabilities. These students demonstrate skills in the subject area that are at or below level 1 performance on the elementary or intermediate level assessments. |
This policy is in effect for only the 2002-03 school year. If the student participates in a locally selected assessment in lieu of a Regents examination (or for the Safety Net, a Regents Competency Examination), that student will not have met the assessment requirements for a local or Regents diploma but the student will be eligible for an IEP diploma. |
200.4(d)(2)(vi) "Supplemental Guidelines for Participation of Students with Disabilities in State Assessments: Locally Selected Assessments", March 2002 |
|
The CSE schedules meetings at the request of parents or staff to discuss issues or concerns which may impact the success of the student, when efforts to address those concerns in the normal course of instruction or supervision have been unsuccessful. |
The CSE should be aware of typical communication roadblocks, both between parent and educators and among educators. |
200.4(d) and (f) 300.343(c) |
||
|
CSE develops a written report for students suspected of having a learning disability including:
|
Members of the evaluation team must certify in writing that the written report reflects their professional opinion, or they must provide separate written statements explaining their individual conclusions. The CSE must assure that the evaluation team for students suspected of having a learning disability includes the student’s general education teacher and at least one person qualified to conduct diagnostic examinations of students. |
200.1(zz)(6), 300.540, 300.541 "Documentation of Determination of Eligibility for Students Suspected of Having a Learning Disability", Appendix C "Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for Students with Disabilities", revised January 2002 |
||
|
Functional behavioral assessment means the process of determining why a student engages behaviors that impede learning and how the student’s behavior relates to the environment. The FBA includes, but is not limited to, the identification of the problem behavior, the definition of the behavior in concrete terms, the identification of the contextual factors that contribute to the behavior (including cognitive and affective factors) and the formulation of a hypothesis regarding the general conditions under which a behavior usually occurs and the probable consequences that serve to maintain it. Consent must be obtained from the parent prior to conducting a functional behavioral assessment. |
FBAs are initiated when the student’s behavior generates a recommendation for a change of placement, or when the student’s behavior presents a barrier to his/her or other student’s learning. |
200.1(r), 200.4(b)(1)(v), "Guidance on Functional Behavioral Assessments for Students with Disabilities", July 1998 "Procedural Safeguards Notice," February 2002 |
||
|
COMPONENTS OF THE IEP |
||||
|
COMPONENTS |
.. |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS | CITATIONS |
|
b |
||||
|
.. |
The CSE determines date of initiation of services. The IEP must indicate the projected date of initiation of each of the services, supports, program modifications and accommodations recommended on the IEP. Some of the services may pertain specifically to the July/August program or to a general education summer school academic program the student must attend. |
Assure that initiation dates for all services are clearly documented in the IEP. |
200.4(d)(2)(xi) 300.347(a)(6) "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002
|
|
|
.. |
The CSE assures that projected dates for annual review and reevaluation are met. The reevaluation and the meeting to review the results of the individual must be conducted no later than three years from the date of the initial determination of eligibility for special education (i.e. the initial CSE meeting). |
Assure that projected review and reevaluation dates are clearly documented in the IEP |
200.4(d)(2)(xi) "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002 "Individual Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations for
Students with Disabilities,"
|
|
|
. |
The CSE describes the individual abilities and needs of the student in each of the following areas including:
Descriptions of present levels of performance must include a description of the impact of the disability on the student’s involvement and progress in the general education curriculum. For students age 14, the present levels of performance should provide information about the student's course of study, including advanced placement courses and career and technical education. For students age 15, and younger, if appropriate, a statement of the student's needs, taking into account the student's preferences and interests as they relate to transition from school to post-school activities. |
There must be a direct relationship between the present levels of performance and the other components of the IEP, including the goals and objectives or benchmarks. Consideration of parent concerns must be reflected in the present levels of performance.
Beginning at age 14, the IEP must also focus on preparing students for adult living, learning and earning in the community. |
200.4(d)(2)(i) 300.346(a), "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document", December 2002 |
|
|
. |
The CSE must consider:
|
For students who are limited English proficient, or deaf or hard of hearing, opportunities for direct instruction in the student’s language or other mode of communication and opportunities to communicate with peers and professional staff in that language or mode of communication. |
200.4(d)(3) 300.308(a-b) "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002 Guidance on bilingual special education, LEP, deaf/Hard of Hearing, Blind/Visually Impaired and Assistive Technology is available through SETRC or http:www.vesid.gov/lsn/home.html |
|
|
Post School Outcome (PSO) statements
|
. |
In collaboration with the student and his/her parent, the CSE develops statements that establish clear desired outcomes which become the basis for transitioning the student from school to postschool activities. Statements of student's projected post school outcomes, based on student needs, preferences and interests, in the areas of employment, post-secondary education and community living. |
For students ages 15-21 (or younger if appropriate) Reviewed annually and modified as appropriate |
200.4(d)(2)(vii-ix) 300.347(b) "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002 "Policy Regarding Including PSO in IEPs," August 1996 |
|
Measurable annual goals and short-term instructional objectives or benchmarks |
. |
Annual goals are written in measurable terms and describe what student is expected to achieve in a 12 month period Annual goals are directly related to the impact of the student’s disability Short-term instructional objectives or benchmarks are measurable, intermediate steps between present levels of performance and the annual goals. |
Goals and objectives should be consistent with the student’s needs and abilities, and enable the student to be involved in and progress in the general education curriculum and extracurricular and nonacademic activities. |
200.4(d)(2)(iii)(a-b), 300.347(a)(2) "Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002 |
|
COMPONENTS |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
|
b |
. |
|||
|
Special education programs and related services, and program modifications |
. |
CSE ensures that description of programs and services includes:
|
Keep the "big picture" in mind:
Inform parents of changes in allowable accommodations of elementary and intermediate state assessments |
200.6(a-l), 200.4(d)(2)(iv-v), 200.4(d)(2) (xi-xiii), 300.347(a)(3 and 6) "Changes in Allowable Testing Accommodations on Elementary and Intermediate-Level Tests, Effective September 2002" , February 2002
|
|
COMPONENTS |
CLARIFICATION |
CONSIDERATIONS |
CITATIONS |
|
|
b |
. |
|||
|
Participation in general education classes, nonacademic and extracurricular activities |
. |
The CSE must first consider placement in general education with appropriate support for the student and the student's teachers. The IEP must include statements of the child's present levels of educational performance, including how the student's disability affects involvement and progress in the general education. The IEP will explain the extent to which the student:
|
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) is clearly explained on the IEP:
|
" Least Restrictive Environment implementation Policy Paper," May 1998 200.4(d)(2) (vii) 300.347(a)(3-4), |
|
CSE develops:
|
Beginning at least by age 14, and updated annually Beginning at least by age 15 or younger if appropriate Beginning at least by age 15 or younger if appropriate Beginning at least by age 15 or younger if appropriate |
200.1(fff) 300.344(b),
|
||
|
While it is not required, it is good practice to indicate:
|
Indicate the Regents/RCT exams student has passed |
"Sample Individualized Education Program (IEP) and Guidance Document," December 2002 |
||
|
Include:
|
. |
200.4(d)(2)(ii),
|
||
|
Include:
|
200.4(d)(1)(iii) |
|||
|
Include in the IEP a statement of:
|
State both manner and frequency of reporting
Ensure that progress is reported in a language understood by the parents |
200.4(d)(2(x) 300.347(a)(7) |
||