Erasers, pencils and rulers in a line

2006–2007
New York State Alternate Assessment

ADMINISTRATION
MANUAL

 

SED seal

 
 

Developed by

The New York State Education Department
Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
Office of Vocational and Educational Services for
Individuals with Disabilities
Measured Progress, Inc.

NOVEMBER 2006

Erasers, pencils and rulers in a line


Table of Contents

Introduction and Overview
        Age Ranges for 2006-07 NYSAA

Background and Development of NYSAA 

Eligibility, Participation, and Age Criteria

Section One: Understanding the Core Curriculum’s Role in Alternate Assessment

        Part A: Test Design
        Part B: Grade Level Content Alignment

Section Two: Steps for Administering NYSAA
       
Step 1: Prepare to Administer NYSAA
        Step 2: Select Alternate Grade Level Indicators (AGLIs) 
        Step 3: Meet with Parent/Family/Guardian and Complete Survey
        Step 4: Select Assessment Task
        Step 5: Prepare to Collect Data
        Step 6: Conduct Assessment Task
        Step 7: Complete Verifying Evidence (VE) Documentation
        Step 8: Complete Data Summary Sheet
        Step 9: Complete Steps 4-8 for 2nd AGLI
        Step 10: Complete Steps 4-9 for each content area to be assessed
        Step 11: Assemble Datafolio 
        Step 12: Submit Datafolio for Scoring

Section Three: Scoring Criteria

        NYSAA Scoring Rubric

Section Four: Effective Practices

Section Five: Measured Progress Profile™ Software

Appendices:

Appendix A – Glossary
Appendix B – Forms

Appendix C – Quick Reference Sheet

Appendix D – Checklist of Things to Remember

Appendix E – 2006-07 NYSAA Resources

Appendix F – NYSAA Frameworks


Introduction and Overview

This manual provides the procedures for assessing the academic achievement of students with severe cognitive disabilities and constructing a New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) datafolio of student performance.

In response to a 2005-06 review of the New York State Testing Program by the United States Department of Education, NYSAA has been restructured effective 2006–07.1

NYSAA is an assessment of the student’s progress in academic content standards. The State Education Department (SED) has aligned NYSAA alternate grade level indicators (AGLIs) with the core curriculum for English language arts (ELA), mathematics, science, and social studies for the administration of NYSAA. It is critical that students participating in alternate assessment have access to the general education curriculum. The content assessed in NYSAA is clearly related to the grade level content; however it is reduced in scope and complexity. Students with severe cognitive disabilities are held to high expectations in order to achieve the New York State Learning Standards. This affords students the opportunity for a richer learning experience.

The data collection period (also known as the administration period) for the 2006– 07 assessment cycle of NYSAA is January 2, 2007 through March 9, 2007. The general sequence of events for administering NYSAA is highlighted below. More detail is provided in subsequent sections of this manual.

NYSAA Summary of Events

  1. Students participate in the New York State Testing Program according to the decision of the Committee on Special Education (CSE) and the student’s date of birth.

  2. For each content area assessed, the student’s instructional team, headed by the lead special education teacher (LSET) provides academic instruction so that the student can achieve proficiency on two different AGLIs. Two AGLIs are required for each assessed content area (ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies).

  3. Parents meet with the LSET about the student’s assessment plan, the AGLIs to be assessed, and to complete the parent/family/guardian survey.

  4. For each AGLI, the student is required to perform one assessment task connected to the AGLI on three different dates.

  5. The student’s instructional team members conduct assessment tasks, document student performance and rate student performance, which includes the collection of evidence on the last two dates of student performance.

  6. The LSET constructs a datafolio containing the evidence of student performance and the ratings of the student’s level of accuracy and independence and submits it for scoring at the end of the last day of the administration period.

  7. The NYSAA datafolios are scored.

  8. Student reports are issued to school districts.

1 August 2006 memorandum, Important Changes Regarding Administration of the New York State Alternate Assessment for 2006-07.

Students eligible for NYSAA as determined by their CSE, must be assessed on the grade appropriate content that is consistent with the student’s chronological age in accordance with the following chart.

Age Ranges for NYSAA in 2006–07

Assessment Birth Date Reaches Age Given Between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007
Grade 3 ELA, Math September 1, 1997-August 31, 1998 9
Grade 4 ELA, Math, Science September 1, 1996-August 31, 1997 10
Grade 5 ELA, Math, Social Studies September 1, 1995-August 31, 1996 11
Grade 6 ELA, Math September 1, 1994-August 31, 1995 12
Grade 7 ELA, Math September 1, 1993-August 31, 1994 13
Grade 8 ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies September 1, 1992-August 31, 1993 14
Secondary-Level ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies September 1, 1988-August 31, 1990 17* to 18

*Note: NYSAA-eligible students with disabilities who will be leaving school before they reach their eighteenth birthday are encouraged to take the secondary-level NYSAA before they leave school (i.e., when they are 17years-old).

WHAT IS NYSAA?

NYSAA is a datafolio-style assessment that measures progress of students with a severe cognitive disability toward meeting the New York State learning standards. NYSAA requires schools to assess student performance on tasks based on AGLIs that are aligned to the core curriculum. For more information about the core curriculum, please see http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/cores.htm.

WHAT IS A DATAFOLIO?

A datafolio is a collection of student academic performance compiled by the student’s instructional team and scored by qualified scorers. Instructional team members document student performance by rating the student’s level of accuracy and independence as they perform an assessment task on three different dates within the administration period. To verify this documentation, the LSET must include in the datafolio student work samples, Data Collection Sheets, photographs and/or video/audio recordings. Teachers complete the required forms and submit all documentation and evidence in a three-ring binder or fastened folder for regional scoring.

Data is gathered to provide parents/family/guardians, educators, and others with a better understanding of the knowledge, skills, and understanding the student is able to demonstrate. The students’ CSE can use the datafolio to increase their knowledge and understanding of the students’ progress in achieving the learning standards and can be used by the committee in the development of the student’s individualized education program (IEP). Datafolios are scored, and results are included in the school district’s Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) of all students for school accountability. Detailed information about the contents of and procedures for developing the datafolio are presented in Section Two: Steps for Administering NYSAA.

Datafolios must be completed and submitted to building administrators by the close of business on March 9, 2007. No changes or additional work can be done on the datafolio after March 9th. Datafolios will be forwarded to the designated Score Site Coordinator for the Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) or Big Five City school district to be scored between April 9 and May 11, 2007, at a regional location by qualified scorers. Scores will be made available in late summer or early fall 2007.

NYSAA 2006–07 administration materials, including this manual and other information are being sent to each school district statewide. These materials are supplementary to the initial training programs and on-going technical assistance offered to each district on a regional basis by a statewide network of alternate assessment training network (AATN) specialists. Collegial reviews of “datafolios-in-progress” are highly recommended throughout the administration period to help teachers complete quality, scorable datafolios.

For further information and assistance, contact your local AATN or the Regional Lead Trainer (RLT) in your area.

NYSAA REGIONAL LEAD TRAINERS (RLTs)

Kay Locke – Rochester/Buffalo Region
kathryn_locke@STEV.net (607) 295-7955

Linda Rohlin – Syracuse/Watertown/Binghamton Region
lrohlin@cayboces.org (315) 252-2107

Janet Stravitz – Albany/Upstate Region/NYC Regions 1, 2 and 10
janetstravitz@aol.com (845) 634-3624

Ron Miller – District 75/NYC Regions 5, 7 and 8
rmiller68@nyc.rr.com (917) 957-1946

Robert Bedford – Long Island/NYC Regions 3, 4, 6 and 9
bribob@aol.com (516) 454-7856

District and building administrators and colleagues experienced with NYSAA may also be able to assist you when questions arise.


Background and Development of NYSAA

This section of the manual provides background information regarding the development of NYSAA, including federal and State requirements regarding school accountability.

Component of the New York State Assessment

New York State (NYS) conducts a statewide testing program on an annual basis for all students in grades 3 through 8 and high school. NYSAA is part of this statewide testing program. Designed for students with severe cognitive disabilities, NYSAA measures student achievement in the learning standards established for all students in the academic content areas of ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies. NYSAA assures that students with severe cognitive disabilities are included in the State Assessment and their results are accounted for as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
 

Aligns with Requirements

IDEA requires that all students with disabilities have access to the core curriculum with appropriate modifications, supports, and accommodations as recommended by the CSE. NCLB requires that all students participate in State assessments in ELA and mathematics in grades 3 through 8 and high school, and in science at the elementary, middle, and high school levels, and that those performance results are reported. IDEA requires that students with disabilities participate in State Assessments in social studies at elementary, middle, and high school levels as all non-disabled students are required. SED and the State’s contractor, Measured Progress, designed the alternate assessment process to ensure that the knowledge, skills and understandings to be assessed are individualized and reflect appropriately high expectations for students with the most severe cognitive disabilities. NYSAA also meets the legal requirements for participation by students who are unable to participate in the State’s general assessment, even with accommodations.
 

Link to Grade Level Content of the NYS Core Curriculum

In 2005, SED released new core curriculum for ELA and mathematics containing grade level content for pre-kindergarten through high school. Additionally, core curriculum for science and social studies contain grade level content at the elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels. These core curriculums are directly aligned to the NYS learning standards.
 

SED, in cooperation with stakeholders from across the state, has expanded the core curriculum grade level indicators to AGLIs for students with severe cognitive disabilities. AGLIs demonstrate entry to the grade level content of the core curriculum. AGLIs are used to measure a level of mastery of the knowledge, skills, and understandings aligned with the core curriculum established for all students by the Board of Regents.


Eligibility, Participation and Age Criteria

Definition of a Student with a Severe Disability (Section 100.1 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education)

“Students with severe disabilities” refers to students who have limited cognitive abilities combined with behavioral and/or physical limitations and who require highly specialized education and/or social, psychological, and medical services in order to maximize their full potential for useful and meaningful participation in society and for self-fulfillment. Students with severe disabilities may experience severe speech, language, and/or perceptual-cognitive impairments and challenging behaviors that interfere with learning and socialization opportunities. These students may also have extremely fragile physiological conditions and may require personal care, physical/verbal supports, and assistive technology devices.
 

NYSAA Eligibility Criteria

The process of determining eligibility begins with the CSE. The CSE determines on an individual basis whether the student will participate in:

  • the State’s general assessment with or without accommodations;

  • the State’s alternate assessment with or without accommodations; or

  • a combination of the State’s general assessment for some content areas and the State’s alternate assessment for other content areas.

The CSE ensures that decisions regarding participation in the State assessment are not based on:

  • category of disability,

  • language differences,

  • excessive or extended absences, or

  • cultural or environmental factors.

The CSE ensures that each student has a personalized system of communication that addresses his/her needs regarding disability, culture, and native language so the student can demonstrate his/her present level of performance.
 

Tests and other assessment procedures are conducted according to the requirements of section 200.4(b)(6) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education and section 300.320(a)(6) of the Code of Federal Regulations.
 

NYSAA Participation Criteria

Only students with severe cognitive disabilities are eligible for NYSAA. The CSE determines whether or not a student with a severe cognitive disability is eligible to take NYSAA based on the following criteria:

  • the student has a severe cognitive disability and significant deficits in communication/language and significant deficits in adaptive behavior; and

  • the student requires a highly specialized educational program that facilitates the acquisition, application, and transfer of skills across natural environments (home, school, community, and/or workplace); and

  • the student requires educational support systems, such as assistive technology, personal care services, health/medical services, or behavioral intervention.

For further information see http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/alterassessment/home.html.

 


Section One: Understanding the Core Curriculum’s Role in Alternate Assessment

Part A: Test Design

The purpose of this section is to provide teachers with a basic understanding of the test design process, alignment with the learning standards and core curriculum, and provide an overview of similarities and differences between the old NYSAA and the redesigned NYSAA.

Process Summary

Stakeholder groups were assembled by SED to conduct a review of the core curriculum and general education assessment blueprints for ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies. These groups determined priorities for NYSAA based on the core curriculum, assessment blueprints, and developmental applicability for students with severe cognitive disabilities. These steps ensure alignment to the general education curriculum. This alignment work is intended to promote higher expectations for students taking NYSAA.
 

From these priorities, the groups discussed the actual depth and breadth of the alternate assessment requirements. During these discussions, and through ongoing consultation, psychometricians from SED and Measured Progress provided direction for maintaining a valid and reliable assessment.
 

As a result, NYSAA has been redesigned, but still maintains some components that are familiar to LSETs. The new design, based on the NYSAA Frameworks, is briefly stated in the requirements summary below and explained in more detail in Part B: Grade Level Content Alignment of this section.

Requirements Summary

The first part of the NYSAA Frameworks is the NYSAA test blueprints that outline the structure of the alternate assessment for each grade. The blueprints illustrate for each content area (i.e., ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies) the two major areas of curriculum focus to be assessed at each grade. These two required components are further divided into specific curriculum topics called choice components. Teachers are required to construct a student’s datafolio by selecting two of the four choice components under each content area’s required component.

For each choice component selected, the LSET must identify one AGLI. Thus, two AGLIs must be assessed for each content area. For each AGLI, the LSET must collect and document student performance data on three different dates. One piece of verifying evidence must be submitted for each of the last two dates of student performance.
 

Similarities and Differences

LSETs familiar with NYSAA will recognize that some aspects of the assessment have been maintained while other aspects are new or modified from previous years. NYSAA administration requirements are outlined in this manual and will guide LSETs in the administration of the assessment.
 

The following information is meant to provide a brief overview of some of the similarities and differences. This list is not all-inclusive.
 

The following are areas in which changes have occurred:

  • All students participating in NYSAA are being assessed at the same grade level content consistent with their non-disabled peers;

  • NYSAA students will now be assessed at the same age as their peers who are taking the general assessment;

  • Alternate performance indicators (APIs) have been replaced by NEW Alternate Grade Level Indicators (AGLIs) which were created using the core curriculum and assessment blueprints for ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies;

  • Two pieces of verifying evidence are required for each assessed AGLI, and

  • NYSAA is no longer separated into Anchor and Expanded grade equivalents. Now, all grades and content areas assessed have the same requirements for the number of AGLIs and pieces of verifying evidence.

The aspects of NYSAA that may be familiar to LSETs include:

  • documentation of student performance data (i.e.; level of accuracy and level of independence).

  • three dates of student performance data (data points).

  • the types of acceptable verifying evidence.

  • the forms of the NYSAA datafolio are consistent with last year’s administration. However, all forms have been revised for clarity and consistent documentation of student performance data. Only the forms included in Appendix B of this manual can be used this year.


Part B: Grade Level Content Alignment

The purpose of this section is to provide teachers with a basic understanding of the link between the new AGLIs and assessment tasks to the NYS Core Curriculum.

Flow of Alignment

The NYS Board of Regents has approved a set of learning standards  that guide instruction and assessment. These standards represent the core of what students should know, understand, and be able to do as a result of instruction. These learning standards serve as a basis for the core curriculum in ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies.

The core curriculum provides information that specifically addresses the learning standards. Each core curriculum is designed to provide teachers with a basis for instruction. The curriculum for each content area is broken down into smaller components. ELA is broken down into key ideas and standards. Mathematics is broken down into strands and bands. Science is broken down into standards and key ideas. Social studies is broken down into standards and units. For each content area, each component has expectations for student performance. These are considered the grade level performance indicators or content understandings.

NYSAA is aligned to the core curriculum. The grade level expectations were distilled into essences. These essences are the “big ideas” of the grade level expectations. They focus on the essential knowledge, skills, or understandings that students should acquire through instruction. The assessment is based on the essences for each component of each content area. In order to assess students with severe cognitive disabilities on this content, AGLIs were developed.
 

NYS Learning Standards

NYS Learning Standards are defined as the knowledge, skills, and  understandings that students can and do habitually demonstrate over time as a consequence of instruction and experience.
 

Core Curriculum

The core curriculum is defined by SED for each grade in ELA and mathematics and for elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels in science and social studies. The core curriculum for each content area expands upon the NYS Learning Standards and provides a basis for instruction. LSETs should review the core curriculum and locate the grade level content for their student.
 

Required Components

The required components for NYSAA were selected from the core curriculums and are the broad, unifying, general statements of what students need to know.
 

The required components differ for each content area as indicated below and in the NYSAA test blueprints in Appendix F.

  • ELA – Key Ideas

  • Mathematics – Strands

  • Science – Standards

  • Social Studies - Standards

Choice Components

The choice components for NYSAA were selected from the core curriculums and organize the grade level expectations for each content area.
 

The choice components differ for each content area as indicated below.

  • ELA - Standards

  • Mathematics – Bands

  • Science – Key Ideas

  • Social Studies - Units

Grade Level Indicator

The grade level indicators for each content area are the grade level performance expectations. These are intended to assist teachers in determining what the outcomes of instruction should be for students in that grade. Each content area names these a little differently: Grade-Specific Performance Indicators (ELA); Grade-by-Grade Performance Indicators (mathematics); Performance Indicators (science); and Content Understandings (social studies).
 

Essence

The essences are the “big ideas” distilled from the grade level core curriculum on which instruction and assessment are based.
 

Alternate Grade Level Indicator

AGLIs are descriptions of student performance expectations at varying levels of complexity for students with severe cognitive disabilities. AGLIs are aligned to the grade level expectations through essences derived from the core curriculum. AGLIs are the ‘entry points’ to the grade level expectations. AGLIs are the knowledge, skill, or understanding that the student will be assessed against in NYSAA and is the anticipated/desired outcome of academic instruction for students with severe cognitive disabilities.


Section Two: Steps for Administering NYSAA

The purpose of this section is to help teachers select AGLIs, determine appropriate assessment tasks and complete requirements for documenting student performance data for NYSAA datafolios.

Steps for Completing a NYSAA Datafolio

Step 1: Prepare to administer NYSAA

Step 2: Select two AGLIs per content area

Step 3: Meet with Parent/Family/Guardian and complete survey

Steps 4-8: Address one AGLI at a time

Step 4: Select assessment task

Step 5: Prepare to collect data

Step 6: Conduct assessment task

Step 7: Complete Verifying Evidence (VE) documentation

Step 8: Complete Data Summary Sheet

Step 9: Complete steps 4-8 for 2nd AGLI

Step 10: Complete steps 4-9 for each content area to be assessed

Step 11: Assemble the datafolio according to standardized procedures described in the Administration Manual

Step 12: Submit the datafolio to the building administrator no later than close of business on March 9, 2007. The building administrator will forward datafolios to the regional Score Site Coordinator who will coordinate shipping to regional scoring. Only datafolios that follow these procedures can be accepted for scoring.

Please note: Participating in collegial reviews of student datafolios during these steps and throughout the administration period is strongly recommended to help create quality and scorable datafolios.


STEP 1: PREPARE TO ADMINISTER NYSAA

<
Review the IEP

In preparation for administering NYSAA, the LSET and instructional team members:

  • Determine which of their students will be assessed

    • Review the student’s IEP to confirm NYSAA was selected by the CSE for the student.

    • Use the age chart (see page 5) to determine the appropriate content areas that need to be assessed at each student’s grade level.

  • Review the current IEP. Pay particular attention to the present levels of performance (PLP), annual goals and objectives, supports and adaptive equipment needed, accommodations needed, and assistive technology used.

  • Review the student’s latest progress reports, including report cards, previous NYSAA scores, and any other evaluative reports.

  • Reference IEP information and the core curriculum to make an informed selection of AGLIs and assessment tasks that are challenging and appropriate for the student.

STEP 2: SELECT ALTERNATE GRADE LEVEL INDICATORS (AGLIs)
 
Review the new NYSAA Frameworks

Selecting AGLIs is a new process for 2006 – 07. The steps for this selection are outlined below.
 

The LSET reviews the new NYSAA Frameworks for each content area being assessed.
 

Review Test Blueprints

The LSET reviews the Test Blueprints at the beginning of each content  area being assessed in order to identify the required and choice components for that content area and the student’s grade level.
 

Locate Grade Level Expectations

Once the required and choice components are determined, the LSET  locates the grade level expectations for performance. For each content  area the grade level expectations are referred to as follows:

  • For ELA – grade specific performance indicators

  • For mathematics – grade-by-grade performance indicators

  • For science – performance indicators

  • For social studies – content understandings

Review the essences The grade level expectations have been broken down into essences, which are the “big ideas” of these expectations. Review the essences to understand the big ideas that are being taught and assessed at that grade.
 
Review and select 1st AGLI

AGLIs have been developed from the essences. They are listed in the tables found in NYSAA Frameworks according to their level of complexity so teachers can select the AGLI that is most appropriate for the student.

Review the AGLIs in the table and select one based on the considerations below:

  • AGLI should be challenging for the student;

  • AGLI should be appropriate for the student’s current level of academic performance; and

  • AGLI should be based on core curriculum taught in the current school year.

Start from the most complex level and work backwards as you select the AGLI.
 

Using the New
NYSAA Model

Please use the following example to assist in planning the AGLIs for your students.
EXAMPLE:
Student’s date of birth: January 5, 1997

Student will reach age 10 between Sept. 1, 2006 and Aug. 31, 2007

The age chart (see page 5) indicates the student will be assessed in Grade 4 in the ELA, mathematics and science content areas.

Begin by reviewing the introduction to the Alternate Assessment Framework (appendix F). The blueprint indicates students in 4th grade must be assessed in

  • ELA Key Ideas of Reading and Writing

- Key Idea-Reading, Standard 2 or 4
- Key Idea-Writing, Standard 1 or 2

The LSET chooses between Standard 2 or Standard 4 for Reading and Standard 1 or Standard 2 for Writing.
 

Once the standards under reading and writing have been determined, the LSET and instructional team should review the AGLIs to determine the entry point. AGLIs are arranged in the table with increasing complexity. Start at the most complex level and work backwards to the point that is most appropriate for the student.

STEP 3: MEET WITH PARENT/FAMILY/GUARDIAN AND COMPLETE SURVEY
 
Completing the Parent/Family/
Guardian Survey

The purpose of the Parent/Family/Guardian (PFG) Survey is to provide  communication between the instructional team and the student’s family about the alternate assessment process and the student’s ability to apply knowledge, skills, and understandings learned at school to the home or community.

  • During the NYSAA administration period, the LSET arranges a meeting with the parent/family/guardian at school, home, or another location.

  • If a meeting is not possible, the LSET and parent/family/guardian could engage in a telephone conference. The parent/family/ guardian or the LSET fills out the PFG Survey.

  • The third, but least preferred method of completing the PFG Survey, would be for the LSET to ask that the survey be completed by the parent/family/guardian and returned to the LSET.

  • All attempts to contact the parent/family/guardian to complete the survey must be recorded on the last page of the survey. If the parent/family/guardian is unable or unwilling to complete the PFG Survey, all three pages of the survey must be submitted in the datafolio.

STEP 4: SELECT ASSESSMENT TASK
 
Determining an Assessment Task

An assessment task describes the student action related to a specific knowledge, skill, or understanding that is observable and aligned to the AGLI and, in turn, the core curriculum. In past years the assessment task was also referred to as the task, skill or activity.


LSETs may:

  • select a sample assessment task from the NYSAA Frameworks that is aligned with the AGLI,

  • modify a sample assessment task from the NYSAA Frameworks that is aligned with AGLI, or

  • create an original assessment task that is aligned to the AGLI. During scoring, if the scorer is unable to determine the connection between the AGLI and assessment task, the task may not be acceptable.

Selecting or Writing an Assessment Task

It is helpful to review the language of the AGLI to be sure that the task description clearly:

  • states the knowledge, skill, or understanding the student will demonstrate,

  • identifies the task to be assessed, and

  • demonstrates an alignment to the AGLI.

Consider the following items in the student’s IEP:

  • present levels of performance,

  • annual goals and objectives,

  • test accommodations,

  • supports and adaptive equipment,

  • assistive technology.

Select an assessment task appropriate for the student’s learning modalities, abilities and strengths, and communication system. Choose an assessment task that:

  • is aligned with the AGLI selected

  • is very challenging

  • is something the student has not already mastered

  • is driven by grade level content

STEP 5: PREPARE TO COLLECT DATA
 
Preparing to
Collect Data

Before beginning to collect student performance data, consider what materials, equipment, support, and staff are available or needed.
 

When preparing for data collection, analyze the task by asking:

  • What is the expected outcome of the task?

  • How will the outcome of the task be best documented?

  • What is the best way to give students an opportunity to respond positively?

Conduct a task analysis to determine the sequence and steps for the assessment task. List steps that are specific for the assessment task being assessed. Avoid including steps of the activity that are not related to what is being assessed.
 

Analyze the student’s communication and behavior to learn how best to motivate the student. Students who are motivated and participate in meaningful activities are more likely to engage in the assessment task. Encourage independence by providing ample opportunity and reinforcement for approximations.
 

Verifying Evidence

Determine the types of verifying evidence (VE) that will be submitted in the datafolio. Verifying evidence is documentation provided to confirm the student’s performance of the knowledge, skill, or understanding being assessed.
 

Two pieces of verifying evidence are required for each AGLI assessed. They must be from the last two dates of student performance recorded on the Data Summary Sheet. Verifying evidence may include:

  • An original student work sample/work product,

  • A video or audio tape clip (maximum 90 seconds with recorded markers),

  • A sequence of captioned and dated photographs from a single date and assessment task (a minimum of three photographs), and/or

  • An original Data Collection Sheet that includes at least three dates of student performance data on the specified assessment task. This sheet must be used in conjunction with supporting evidence.

Verifying evidence must be labeled to include the following required elements either directly on the verifying evidence or on a VE label:

  • Student’s name

  • Date of student performance

  • Content area

  • AGLI text

  • Assessment task

  • Level of accuracy

  • Level of independence

Labeling verifying evidence is essential to show the connection between the verifying evidence and the data documented on the Data Summary Sheet.
 

Original Student Work Sample
  • The work sample must be an original student work product. (no photocopies)

  • If the work sample has multiple pages, the LSET should clearly number each page to ensure proper review and scoring.

Sequence of Captioned and Dated Photographs

 

Valid photographic evidence includes:

  • a minimum sequence of three photographs (more than three photographs can be included, but fewer than three will not be accepted).

  • a required caption for each photograph with a sentence or two describing student action(s) for each photograph.

  • photographs must be taken on the same date, and support the same assessment task. Photographs taken over more than one day will not be accepted during scoring. If an assessment task cannot be performed on a single date, do not use it and select another assessment task.

  • only the actual steps demonstrating the student performing the specified assessment task will be accepted. Do not include prerequisite steps in a sequence. The sequence must show the steps involved in completing the assessment task. A photograph of the finished “product” may be included in the minimum sequence of three.

Video or Audio Tape Clips

Valid video and audio tape evidence includes:

  • only one video/audio tape per datafolio. Tapes or cassettes may contain multiple clips as evidence for the assessed AGLIs.

  • clips no longer than 90 seconds that show the student performing the assessment task. Do not include pre-requisite steps or preparation in the clip.

  • clips arranged by content area and documented on the Video/Audio Tape Clip Summary Form. Secure the summary form to the tape case with a rubber band to assist scorers in locating and reviewing clips.

  • only VHS-compatible video tapes. Only VHS-compatible video equipment will be provided at scoring sites. If digital images are submitted, it is the LSET’s responsibility to identify the software and operating system used and to provide all necessary equipment and technical support to allow scoring of the evidence. Otherwise, the evidence will not be scored.

Recorded Markers for Video/ Audio Tape Clips

All video/audio tape clip evidence must contain a recorded marker at the beginning of the clip and include:

  • student’s name

  • date of student performance

  • content area

  • AGLI text

  • assessment task

When the assessment task is completed, a second marker must be recorded at the end of the clip indicating:

  • level of accuracy, and

  • level of independence for the assessed task

Note: A VE label attached to the tape or tape box does not fulfill the requirement for a recorded marker. If the required elements are not recorded at the beginning and end of the clip, it will not be scored.
 

Securing Tapes

In order to ensure that the tape is not separated from the datafolio, each tape must be labeled with the student’s name, teacher’s name, and school name. Attach the tape securely to the datafolio with a plastic sleeve, binder clip, or envelope.
 

Photographic and Video/Audio Tape Evidence Guidelines

When preparing to collect video, audio, or photographic evidence, please follow the guidelines below.

  • Ask a colleague to operate the camera or recorder while you work with the student.

  • The novelty of taping or photographing could disrupt the routine or distract students, resulting in an inaccurate record. For this reason, the camera and operator should be as unobtrusive as possible. It might also help if video/audio taping/photographing are done regularly, so that students do not find it novel.

  • If an automatic date/time stamp is present on the camera or recorder, be sure that it is accurate and does not contradict the data documented by the LSET.

Informed Consent for Photographing, Video/Audio Tape Recording (required for all photographic/ video/audio evidence)

 

The Informed Consent for Photographing and Video/Audio Tape Recording form is required and must be signed within the administration period by the student’s parent/family/guardian and included in the datafolio.

  • Do not take photographs or tape recordings unless you obtain written permission.

  • If photographic/video/audio tape evidence is submitted without permission, such evidence will not be scored.

  • Do not substitute local or district blanket permission forms. NYSAA permission forms must be used. Adhere to local school policy regarding permission for photographing students.

Informed Consent for Incidental Photographing, Vide/Audio Tape Recording

If the student’s peers are depicted in a tape or photograph, the Informed Consent for Incidental Photographing, Video/Audio Tape Recording must be completed and kept on file by the district. Images of peers may not be “blacked out” or “faces covered.” Cropping the image to remove peers is acceptable.

 

Original Data Collection Sheet (DCS)
  • A Data Collection Sheet may be submitted as verifying evidence for one or both of the last two dates on the Data Summary Sheet.

  • When an original Data Collection Sheet is submitted as verifying evidence, it must include a minimum of three dates of data within the specified administration period (January 2 to March 9, 2007).

  • Only data from the last three (most recent) dates of student performance, from within the administration period, can be transcribed to the Data Summary Sheet. This data may be confirmed by a combination of evidence, one piece of evidence for each of the last two dates.

  • Three types of Data Collection Sheets are available (Appendix B):

    • multi-step

    • time segment

    • single-step

  • Data Collection Sheets must be completed in full, including the name and initials of person(s) collecting data for each date. Please Note: If this or any part of the Data Collection Sheet is not complete, it may not be accepted.

  • A Data Collection Sheet must be accompanied by another type of verifying evidence (student work, photographs, video/audio tape) or an Observer Verification Form (OVF). Evidence accompanying a Data Collection Sheet is called supporting evidence. (See Supporting Evidence Section below).

Supporting Evidence Submitted with a Data Collection Sheet

Supporting evidence is required whenever a Data Collection Sheet is submitted as verifying evidence. Since a Data Collection Sheet can be used to verify either one or both of the last two dates of student performance, the supporting evidence must support student performance on the same date(s) being verified by the Data Collection Sheet. One piece of supporting evidence is required for each date transcribed to the Data Summary Sheet from the Data Collection Sheet.
 

All requirements and considerations for verifying evidence also apply to supporting evidence submitted with a Data Collection Sheet.
 

Supporting evidence for a Data Collection Sheet may include:

  • an original work sample/product,

  • a sequence of captioned dated photographs,

  • a video/audio tape clip, or

  • an Observer Verification Form.

Observer Verification Form

The Observer Verification Form was designed to strengthen the procedural validity of the assessment. An independent person (someone other than the person collecting the data) observes the student performing the assessment task with a member of the instructional team, affirming that the assessment task was conducted. When submitting an Observer Verification Form as supporting evidence with a Data Collection Sheet:

  • The Observer Verification Form cannot stand alone as verifying evidence; it must be attached to the Data Collection Sheet.

  • An observer must be a certified and/or licensed teacher, administrator, school psychologist or related service provider.

  • Observers cannot be supplementary school personnel. Supplementary school personnel means a teacher aide or a teaching assistant as described in section 80-5.6 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education.

  • The person collecting the student performance data cannot sign the Observer Verification Form. During scoring, the scorer will confirm this by reviewing the name and initials of the staff member on the Data Collection Sheet and comparing it to the signature on the Observer Verification Form.

  • The person collecting data must be different from the person observing the task and signing the Observer Verification Form.

  • Only one date of recorded observation may be submitted per Observer Verification Form.

  • The date of the assessment task documented on the Observer Verification Form must be the same date the task was performed.

  • The date of the observer signature must be the same date the assessment task was performed.

Only the revised Observer Verification Form found in Appendix B of this Administration Manual (November 2006) will be accepted.
 

STEP 6: CONDUCT ASSESSMENT TASK
Assessing Student Performance

When conducting the assessment of the student performing the  assessment task, LSETs should:

  • provide initial directions and materials;

  • use the student’s preferred mode of communication;

  • provide supports, program accommodations, test accommodations and adaptive equipment as specified on the IEP;

  • be sure that all documents are ready to be completed and signed at the time the task is completed or the same day the task is conducted. If for example a Data Collection Sheet is being submitted as evidence with an Observer Verification Form as supporting evidence, be sure the independent observer is present before the assessment task is performed and that the Observer Verification Form is ready to complete and be signed the same day the assessment task is completed; and

  • conduct the task at school or a school sponsored activity. Homework or work done outside these parameters will not be accepted unless the student receives special education instruction at home, in a hospital, or other facility (as noted on the Student Page).

Recording Performance Data

When recording student performance data:

  • determine who will conduct the task, collect data, and observe the  student’s performance when an Observer Verification Form is needed as supporting evidence.

  • record data on student work during or immediately following student performance.

  • record the student’s performance of the same assessment task on at least three separate dates. The last three dates of student performance data should be transcribed to the Data Summary Sheet for the assessed content area and AGLI.

  • complete the remaining required elements of the verifying evidence.

Precautions when Recording Performance Data
  • All contents of the datafolio (except student work) must be typed or handwritten using permanent ink. DO NOT USE PENCIL.

  • If mistakes or errors are made while recording student performance data, they must be manually crossed out, corrected and initialed. Do not erase or use correction fluid.

  • Photocopies or use of correction fluid or “black out” on the Data Summary Sheet or verifying evidence (student work samples, written information related to video/audio tapes and photo captions, information recorded on Data Collection Sheets, Data Summary Sheets and Observer Verification Forms) will not be accepted.

Determining Level of Accuracy

Accuracy is a key measure of student performance for NYSAA. The LSET determines the level of accuracy by comparing the number of correct responses given by the student to the total number of expected responses.
 

For example, 20 correct responses out of 25 possible total responses = 4/5 = 80% accurate. The teacher uses the scoring rubric to convert this percentage to a rating (80% accurate = Level 4 rating). The percentage and rating are documented on the Data Summary Sheet for each date.
 

Determining Level of Independence

Independence is a key measure of student performance for NYSAA. The level of independence is determined when the teacher observes and measures the frequency of cues or prompts the student receives during an assessment activity. The number of steps not requiring prompts per number of steps or items in the assessment task determines the percentage of independence.
 

Tasks may be documented as multi-step, time segmented or single-step (see Data Collection Sheet templates in Appendix B).

  • In a multi-step assessment task, the teacher identifies the number of steps required to complete the assessment task. The teacher calculates the percentage of student independence based on the number of steps in which the student performed independently compared to the total number of steps (no prompts in 2 of 6 steps = 2/6 = 33% independent). The teacher converts the level of independence using the scoring rubric (33% independent = Level 2) and enters the percentage and rating on the Data Summary Sheet for each date.

  • In a time-segmented assessment task, the teacher divides the activity into equal time segments and counts the number of time segments in which the student received no prompts or cues compared to the total number of time segments. The teacher uses the scoring rubric to determine the level of independence (0%– 100%) and enters the percentage and rating on the Data Summary Sheet for each date.

  • In a single-step assessment task, the student is either 100% independent (receives no prompts or cues) or 0% independent (receives one or more prompts or cues). Teachers planning single-step tasks may wish to redesign the tasks as time segmented or multi-step, in order to provide the student with greater opportunities to demonstrate independence across the 0% to 100% continuum of percentages.

Natural or Initial Directions

Initial directions to students prior to performing an assessment task are considered a “natural cue.” A natural cue or initial set of directions:

  • should not be considered a cue/prompt.

  • does not affect the level of independence documented.

  • is presented in a format that is best suited to the student’s communication abilities.

Cues or Prompts

Cues or prompts (not initial directions):

  • are measured by frequency (the number of times they are provided) and affect the independence score.

  • are given to the student to increase the likelihood that he/she will give the correct or desired response.

  • are not considered test accommodations.

  • are a product of the learning style and/or physical and sensory abilities of the student (e.g., physical, visual, verbal, auditory, sensory).

In order to decrease a student’s need for cues or prompts to perform an assessment task, the LSET should:

  • structure tasks, environments, and materials in ways that enable the student to perform as independently and as accurately as possible.

  • decrease the frequency of cues or prompts over time, in order to increase the student’s independence.

Test Accommodations

The CSE determines which test accommodations will be required based on the student’s documented needs. Test accommodations:

  • are consistent with the student’s IEP.

  • are designed to allow the student to demonstrate his/her knowledge, skill, and understanding with greater independence.

  • do not change the level of the assessment, the construct of the assessment, or the criteria of the actual assessment task.

  • are provided to the student during instruction and not just for assessment.

Distinguishing Between Cues/Prompts and Test Accommodations

Examples of cues/prompts include:

  • The student receives purposeful physical guidance or restriction of movement during the assessment to obtain a desired response.

  • The student receives “hints” or additional detail, or is immediately told a response is incorrect.

  • A fatigued or frustrated student receives additional cues to complete parts of the assessment task or is prompted to remain focused.

  • The student is redirected (verbally or physically).

  • Templates and other formats are provided that give the answer to the student.

Test accommodations provide for:

  • adaptive or special equipment (e.g., use study carrel).

  • extended time to complete the assessment (e.g., double time).

  • assessment to be administered in conditions or location with minimal distraction (e.g., change room to one with minimized visual distraction or minimize noise in existing room).

STEP 7: COMPLETE VERIFYING EVIDENCE (VE) DOCUMENTATION
Types of Evidence

Each datafolio contains two types of evidence

  • Data Summary Sheets (DSSs)

  • Verifying Evidence (VE)

Required Elements for ALL Evidence

After completing the assessment task:

  • Select two pieces of verifying evidence which confirm data for the last two dates of student performance for each of the two tasks selected for the two AGLIs.

  • Record all required elements for verifying evidence either directly on the verifying evidence or on a VE label attached to the evidence:

    • student’s name 

    • date of student performance

    • content area

    • AGLI text

    • assessment task

    • level of accuracy

    • level of independence

Please Note: Failure to record all required information on the verifying evidence may disqualify the student from receiving a reportable score.

  • Place the verifying evidence in the datafolio directly behind the corresponding DSS.

  • If verifying evidence is a Data Collection Sheet, include the required supporting evidence for the date(s) transcribed to the DSS.

Please Note: If more than two pieces of verifying evidence are submitted for an AGLI, only the first two pieces of verifying evidence following the DSS will be reviewed by the scorer. This should not be confused with “supporting evidence” submitted with a Data Collection Sheet or a single piece of verifying evidence that contains multiple pages.
 

Verifying Evidence Labels

LSETs may either record the required elements directly on the verifying evidence or affix a VE label to the verifying evidence to record this information. (See Appendix B for a template.) Template prints on 3.33" x 4" peel-n-stick labels.

The VE label should be placed so that no student work or information is obstructed. Labels can be placed on the back of the evidence. If the label obscures any part of the student work or information, it may not be scored.
 

STEP 8: COMPLETE DATA SUMMARY SHEET
Complete Data Summary Sheet

A DSS is required for each AGLI being assessed. The LSET should:

  • Complete all fields on the DSS including student information, required and choice components, AGLI code (see NYSAA Frameworks in appendix F) and text, and assessment task. Please Note: Failure to record all required information on the DSS may disqualify the student from receiving a reportable score in that content area. If the DSS for a specified AGLI is missing, the AGLI will not be scored.

  • Transcribe the last three dates of documented student performance data to the DSS for the assessed AGLI in chronological order. The last date of student performance appears in the right hand column.

  • Record levels of accuracy and independence as percentages.

  • Convert percentages to corresponding rubric ratings using the scoring rubric located on the DSS.

Make sure the two pieces of verifying evidence submitted for the assessed AGLI:

  • confirm the information recorded on the DSS,

  • correspond to the last two dates listed on the DSS, and

  • are placed directly behind the corresponding DSS.

STEP 9: COMPLETE STEPS 4-8 FOR 2nd AGLI
 
STEP 10: COMPLETE REMAINING CONTENT AREAS
 

Return to Step 4 and complete each step for the remaining content area(s) in which the student is being assessed in 2006–07.
 

STEP 11: ASSEMBLE DATAFOLIO
Datafolio Binder

All assessment documents are secured in a ½” to 1” thick three-ring binder or other fastened folder that will secure the datafolio contents. Binders/folders should have a pocket on the inside front cover to hold demographic and scoring documents during the scoring process.
 

Required Datafolio Elements

Arrange items within the datafolio in order, according to the NYSAA Table of Contents (See Appendix B).

  • NYSAA Student Page

  • Table of Contents

  • Parent/Family/Guardian Survey

  • Informed Consent for Photographing and Video/Audio Tape

  • Recording (if photographic/video/audio tape evidence is submitted)

The following documents must be included for each content area assessed.

  • Data Summary Sheet for first AGLI

  • Verifying evidence (2 pieces of VE per AGLI) 

    • Supporting evidence if verifying evidence is a Data Collection Sheet

  • Data Summary Sheet for second AGLI

  • Verifying evidence (2 pieces of VE per AGLI)

  • Supporting evidence if verifying evidence is a Data Collection Sheet

Collegial Review

LSETs should seek a collegial review of their datafolios. This entails having a colleague or AATN review the datafolio contents to date (for example, one entire content area that is completed or one AGLI that is completed). A collegial review will ensure that LSETs are on the right track, meeting the procedural requirements for NYSAA, and making the appropriate connections between the AGLIs and the assessment tasks.
 

Collegial reviews are strongly recommended for the 2006-07 NYSAA administration period. These reviews will be required effective 2007-08.
 

Finalizing the Datafolio

Once documentation of student performance has been completed for all AGLIs assessed, all required documents are assembled in the binder. Before the end of the administration period, the LSET:

  • shares the datafolio with a colleague familiar with NYSAA,

  • shares the datafolio with a supervisor or administrator, or

  • participates in collegial review sessions provided by his/her AATN.

Final Checklist

To ensure the datafolio is ready for scoring, use the Checklist of Things to Remember provided in Appendix D.
 

Please Note: Failure to complete all the required documents as specified in this manual may jeopardize the student receiving a reportable score.
 

STEP 12: SUBMIT DATAFOLIO FOR SCORING
 
Submit the Datafolio for Scoring

All datafolios (in and out-of-district placements) must be completed and submitted to building administrators by the close of business on March 9, 2007.
 

The deadline for datafolios to be received by the district of residence for out-of-district placements is March 16, 2007.
 

The deadline for all datafolios (in and out-of-district placements) to be received by the Score Site Coordinator is March 23, 2007.
 

Scoring Datafolios and Reporting Results

Building administrators will forward datafolios to the designated Score Site Coordinator for BOCES or Big Five City school districts. Score Site Coordinators will transfer datafolios to a regional scoring center. The NYSAA datafolios will be scored at a regional location by qualified scorers. Student results will be made available in late summer or early fall 2007.