
2006–2007
New York State Alternate Assessment
|
|
Developed by
The New York State Education Department
Office of Standards, Assessment and Reporting
Office of Vocational and Educational Services for
Individuals with Disabilities
Measured Progress, Inc.
NOVEMBER 2006

Eligibility, Participation, and Age Criteria
Section One: Understanding the Core Curriculum’s Role in Alternate Assessment
Part A: Test DesignSection Four: Effective Practices
Section Five: Measured Progress Profile™ Software
Appendices: Appendix A – GlossaryStudent Page
Table of Contents
Parent/Family/Guardian Survey
Informed Consent for Photographing, Video/Audio Tape Recording
Informed Consent for Incidental Photographing and Video/Audio Tape Recording of Classroom Peers
Video and Audio Tape Clip Summary Form
Data Summary Sheets
Verifying Evidence (VE) label template
Data Collection Sheets (Multi-Step, Time Segment, Single-Step)
Observer Verification Form (OVF)
Appendix C – Quick Reference Sheet Appendix D – Checklist of Things to Remember
In response to a 2005-06 review of the New York State Testing Program by the United States Department of Education, NYSAA has been restructured effective 2006–07.1
NYSAA is an assessment of the student’s progress in academic content standards. The State Education Department (SED) has aligned NYSAA alternate grade level indicators (AGLIs) with the core curriculum for English language arts (ELA), mathematics, science, and social studies for the administration of NYSAA. It is critical that students participating in alternate assessment have access to the general education curriculum. The content assessed in NYSAA is clearly related to the grade level content; however it is reduced in scope and complexity. Students with severe cognitive disabilities are held to high expectations in order to achieve the New York State Learning Standards. This affords students the opportunity for a richer learning experience.
The data collection period (also known as the administration period) for the 2006– 07 assessment cycle of NYSAA is January 2, 2007 through March 9, 2007. The general sequence of events for administering NYSAA is highlighted below. More detail is provided in subsequent sections of this manual.
NYSAA Summary of EventsFor each content area assessed, the student’s instructional team, headed by the lead special education teacher (LSET) provides academic instruction so that the student can achieve proficiency on two different AGLIs. Two AGLIs are required for each assessed content area (ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies).
Parents meet with the LSET about the student’s assessment plan, the AGLIs to be assessed, and to complete the parent/family/guardian survey.
For each AGLI, the student is required to perform one assessment task connected to the AGLI on three different dates.
The student’s instructional team members conduct assessment tasks, document student performance and rate student performance, which includes the collection of evidence on the last two dates of student performance.
The LSET constructs a datafolio containing the evidence of student performance and the ratings of the student’s level of accuracy and independence and submits it for scoring at the end of the last day of the administration period.
The NYSAA datafolios are scored.
Student reports are issued to school districts.
1 August 2006 memorandum, Important Changes Regarding Administration of the New York State Alternate Assessment for 2006-07.
Students eligible for NYSAA as determined by their CSE, must be assessed on the grade appropriate content that is consistent with the student’s chronological age in accordance with the following chart.
Age Ranges for NYSAA in 2006–07| Assessment | Birth Date | Reaches Age Given Between September 1, 2006 and August 31, 2007 |
|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 ELA, Math | September 1, 1997-August 31, 1998 | 9 |
| Grade 4 ELA, Math, Science | September 1, 1996-August 31, 1997 | 10 |
| Grade 5 ELA, Math, Social Studies | September 1, 1995-August 31, 1996 | 11 |
| Grade 6 ELA, Math | September 1, 1994-August 31, 1995 | 12 |
| Grade 7 ELA, Math | September 1, 1993-August 31, 1994 | 13 |
| Grade 8 ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies | September 1, 1992-August 31, 1993 | 14 |
| Secondary-Level ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies | September 1, 1988-August 31, 1990 | 17* to 18 |
*Note: NYSAA-eligible students with disabilities who will be leaving school before they reach their eighteenth birthday are encouraged to take the secondary-level NYSAA before they leave school (i.e., when they are 17years-old).
WHAT IS NYSAA?
NYSAA is a datafolio-style assessment that measures progress of students with a severe cognitive disability toward meeting the New York State learning standards. NYSAA requires schools to assess student performance on tasks based on AGLIs that are aligned to the core curriculum. For more information about the core curriculum, please see http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/cores.htm.WHAT IS A DATAFOLIO?
A datafolio is a collection of student academic performance compiled by the student’s instructional team and scored by qualified scorers. Instructional team members document student performance by rating the student’s level of accuracy and independence as they perform an assessment task on three different dates within the administration period. To verify this documentation, the LSET must include in the datafolio student work samples, Data Collection Sheets, photographs and/or video/audio recordings. Teachers complete the required forms and submit all documentation and evidence in a three-ring binder or fastened folder for regional scoring.Data is gathered to provide parents/family/guardians, educators, and others with a better understanding of the knowledge, skills, and understanding the student is able to demonstrate. The students’ CSE can use the datafolio to increase their knowledge and understanding of the students’ progress in achieving the learning standards and can be used by the committee in the development of the student’s individualized education program (IEP). Datafolios are scored, and results are included in the school district’s Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) of all students for school accountability. Detailed information about the contents of and procedures for developing the datafolio are presented in Section Two: Steps for Administering NYSAA.
Datafolios must be completed and submitted to building administrators by the close of business on March 9, 2007. No changes or additional work can be done on the datafolio after March 9th. Datafolios will be forwarded to the designated Score Site Coordinator for the Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) or Big Five City school district to be scored between April 9 and May 11, 2007, at a regional location by qualified scorers. Scores will be made available in late summer or early fall 2007.
NYSAA 2006–07 administration materials, including this manual and other information are being sent to each school district statewide. These materials are supplementary to the initial training programs and on-going technical assistance offered to each district on a regional basis by a statewide network of alternate assessment training network (AATN) specialists. Collegial reviews of “datafolios-in-progress” are highly recommended throughout the administration period to help teachers complete quality, scorable datafolios.
For further information and assistance, contact your local AATN or the Regional Lead Trainer (RLT) in your area.
NYSAA REGIONAL LEAD TRAINERS (RLTs)
Kay Locke – Rochester/Buffalo RegionLinda Rohlin – Syracuse/Watertown/Binghamton Region
lrohlin@cayboces.org (315) 252-2107
Janet Stravitz – Albany/Upstate Region/NYC Regions 1, 2 and 10
janetstravitz@aol.com (845) 634-3624
Ron Miller – District 75/NYC Regions 5, 7 and 8
rmiller68@nyc.rr.com (917) 957-1946
Robert Bedford – Long Island/NYC Regions 3, 4, 6 and 9
bribob@aol.com (516) 454-7856
District and building administrators and colleagues experienced with NYSAA may also be able to assist you when questions arise.
This section of the manual provides background information regarding the development of NYSAA, including federal and State requirements regarding school accountability.
| Component of the New York State Assessment |
New York State (NYS) conducts a statewide testing program on an annual basis for all students in grades 3 through 8 and high school. NYSAA is part of this statewide testing program. Designed for students with severe cognitive disabilities, NYSAA measures student achievement in the learning standards established for all students in the academic content areas of ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies. NYSAA assures that students with severe cognitive disabilities are included in the State Assessment and their results are accounted for as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
|
| Aligns with Requirements |
IDEA requires that all students with disabilities have access to the core curriculum with appropriate modifications, supports, and accommodations as recommended by the CSE. NCLB requires that all students participate in State assessments in ELA and mathematics in grades 3 through 8 and high school, and in science at the elementary, middle, and high school levels, and that those performance results are reported. IDEA requires that students with disabilities participate in State Assessments in social studies at elementary, middle, and high school levels as all non-disabled students are required. SED and the State’s contractor, Measured Progress, designed the alternate assessment process to ensure that the knowledge, skills and understandings to be assessed are individualized and reflect appropriately high expectations for students with the most severe cognitive disabilities. NYSAA also meets the legal requirements for participation by students who are unable to participate in the State’s general assessment, even with accommodations.
|
| Link to Grade Level Content of the NYS Core Curriculum |
In 2005, SED released new core curriculum for ELA and mathematics containing grade level content for pre-kindergarten through high school. Additionally, core curriculum for science and social studies contain grade level content at the elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels. These core curriculums are directly aligned to the NYS learning standards.
SED, in cooperation with stakeholders from across the state, has expanded the core curriculum grade level indicators to AGLIs for students with severe cognitive disabilities. AGLIs demonstrate entry to the grade level content of the core curriculum. AGLIs are used to measure a level of mastery of the knowledge, skills, and understandings aligned with the core curriculum established for all students by the Board of Regents. |
| Definition of a Student with a Severe Disability (Section 100.1 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education) | “Students with severe disabilities” refers to students who have limited cognitive abilities combined with behavioral and/or physical limitations and who require highly specialized education and/or social, psychological, and medical services in order to maximize their full potential for useful and meaningful participation in society and for self-fulfillment. Students with severe disabilities may experience severe speech, language, and/or perceptual-cognitive impairments and challenging behaviors that interfere with learning and socialization opportunities. These students may also have extremely fragile physiological conditions and may require personal care, physical/verbal supports, and assistive technology devices.
|
| NYSAA Eligibility Criteria |
The process of determining eligibility begins with the CSE. The CSE determines on an individual basis whether the student will participate in:
the State’s alternate assessment with or without accommodations; or a combination of the State’s general assessment for some content areas and the State’s alternate assessment for other content areas. The CSE ensures that decisions regarding participation in the State assessment are not based on:
language differences, excessive or extended absences, or cultural or environmental factors. The CSE ensures that each student has a personalized system of communication that addresses his/her needs regarding disability, culture, and native language so the student can demonstrate his/her present level of performance.
Tests and other assessment procedures are conducted according to the requirements of section 200.4(b)(6) of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education and section 300.320(a)(6) of the Code of Federal Regulations.
|
| NYSAA Participation Criteria |
Only students with severe cognitive disabilities are eligible for NYSAA. The CSE determines whether or not a student with a severe cognitive disability is eligible to take NYSAA based on the following criteria:
the student requires educational support systems, such as assistive technology, personal care services, health/medical services, or behavioral intervention. For further information see http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/alterassessment/home.html.
|
The purpose of this section is to provide teachers with a basic understanding of the test design process, alignment with the learning standards and core curriculum, and provide an overview of similarities and differences between the old NYSAA and the redesigned NYSAA.
| Process Summary |
Stakeholder groups were assembled by SED to conduct a review of the core curriculum and general education assessment blueprints for ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies. These groups determined priorities for NYSAA based on the core curriculum, assessment blueprints, and developmental applicability for students with severe cognitive disabilities. These steps ensure alignment to the general education curriculum. This alignment work is intended to promote higher expectations for students taking NYSAA.
From these priorities, the groups discussed the actual depth and breadth of the alternate assessment requirements. During these discussions, and through ongoing consultation, psychometricians from SED and Measured Progress provided direction for maintaining a valid and reliable assessment. As a result, NYSAA has been redesigned, but still maintains some components that are familiar to LSETs. The new design, based on the NYSAA Frameworks, is briefly stated in the requirements summary below and explained in more detail in Part B: Grade Level Content Alignment of this section. |
| Requirements Summary | The first part of the NYSAA Frameworks is the NYSAA test blueprints that outline the structure of the alternate assessment for each grade. The blueprints illustrate for each content area (i.e., ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies) the two major areas of curriculum focus to be assessed at each grade. These two required components are further divided into specific curriculum topics called choice components. Teachers are required to construct a student’s datafolio by selecting two of the four choice components under each content area’s required component. For each choice component selected, the LSET must identify one AGLI. Thus, two AGLIs must be assessed for each content area. For each AGLI, the LSET must collect and document student performance data on three different dates. One piece of verifying evidence must be submitted for each of the last two dates of student performance.
|
| Similarities and Differences |
LSETs familiar with NYSAA will recognize that some aspects of the assessment have been maintained while other aspects are new or modified from previous years. NYSAA administration requirements are outlined in this manual and will guide LSETs in the administration of the assessment.
The following information is meant to provide a brief overview of some of the similarities and differences. This list is not all-inclusive. The following are areas in which changes have occurred:
The aspects of NYSAA that may be familiar to LSETs include:
|
The purpose of this section is to provide teachers with a basic understanding of the link between the new AGLIs and assessment tasks to the NYS Core Curriculum.
| Flow of Alignment |
The NYS Board of Regents has approved a set of learning standards that guide instruction and assessment. These standards represent the core of what students should know, understand, and be able to do as a result of instruction. These learning standards serve as a basis for the core curriculum in ELA, mathematics, science, and social studies. The core curriculum provides information that specifically addresses the learning standards. Each core curriculum is designed to provide teachers with a basis for instruction. The curriculum for each content area is broken down into smaller components. ELA is broken down into key ideas and standards. Mathematics is broken down into strands and bands. Science is broken down into standards and key ideas. Social studies is broken down into standards and units. For each content area, each component has expectations for student performance. These are considered the grade level performance indicators or content understandings. NYSAA is aligned to the core curriculum. The grade level expectations were distilled into essences. These essences are the “big ideas” of the grade level expectations. They focus on the essential knowledge, skills, or understandings that students should acquire through instruction. The assessment is based on the essences for each component of each content area. In order to assess students with severe cognitive disabilities on this content, AGLIs were developed.
|
| NYS Learning Standards |
NYS Learning Standards are defined as the knowledge, skills, and understandings that students can and do habitually demonstrate over time as a consequence of instruction and experience.
|
| Core Curriculum | The core curriculum is defined by SED for each grade in ELA and mathematics and for elementary, intermediate, and secondary levels in science and social studies. The core curriculum for each content area expands upon the NYS Learning Standards and provides a basis for instruction. LSETs should review the core curriculum and locate the grade level content for their student.
|
| Required Components |
The required components for NYSAA were selected from the core curriculums and are the broad, unifying, general statements of what students need to know.
The required components differ for each content area as indicated below and in the NYSAA test blueprints in Appendix F.
|
| Choice Components |
The choice components for NYSAA were selected from the core curriculums and organize the grade level expectations for each content area.
The choice components differ for each content area as indicated below.
|
| Grade Level Indicator |
The grade level indicators for each content area are the grade level performance expectations. These are intended to assist teachers in determining what the outcomes of instruction should be for students in that grade. Each content area names these a little differently: Grade-Specific Performance Indicators (ELA); Grade-by-Grade Performance Indicators (mathematics); Performance Indicators (science); and Content Understandings (social studies).
|
| Essence |
The essences are the “big ideas” distilled from the grade level core curriculum on which instruction and assessment are based.
|
| Alternate Grade Level Indicator |
AGLIs are descriptions of student performance expectations at varying levels of complexity for students with severe cognitive disabilities. AGLIs are aligned to the grade level expectations through essences derived from the core curriculum. AGLIs are the ‘entry points’ to the grade level expectations. AGLIs are the knowledge, skill, or understanding that the student will be assessed against in NYSAA and is the anticipated/desired outcome of academic instruction for students with severe cognitive disabilities. |
The purpose of this section is to help teachers select AGLIs, determine appropriate assessment tasks and complete requirements for documenting student performance data for NYSAA datafolios.
Steps for Completing a NYSAA Datafolio
|
Step 1: Prepare to administer NYSAA |
|
Step 2: Select two AGLIs per content area |
|
Step 3: Meet with Parent/Family/Guardian and complete survey |
|
Steps 4-8: Address one AGLI at a time |
|
Step 4: Select assessment task |
|
Step 5: Prepare to collect data |
|
Step 6: Conduct assessment task |
|
Step 7: Complete Verifying Evidence (VE) documentation |
|
Step 8: Complete Data Summary Sheet |
|
Step 9: Complete steps 4-8 for 2nd AGLI |
|
Step 10: Complete steps 4-9 for each content area to be assessed |
|
Step 11: Assemble the datafolio according to standardized procedures described in the Administration Manual |
|
Step 12: Submit the datafolio to the building administrator no later than close of business on March 9, 2007. The building administrator will forward datafolios to the regional Score Site Coordinator who will coordinate shipping to regional scoring. Only datafolios that follow these procedures can be accepted for scoring. |
|
Please note: Participating in collegial reviews of student datafolios during these steps and throughout the administration period is strongly recommended to help create quality and scorable datafolios. |
STEP 1: PREPARE TO ADMINISTER NYSAA
| Review the IEP |
In preparation for administering NYSAA, the LSET and instructional team members:
|
|
STEP 2: SELECT ALTERNATE GRADE LEVEL INDICATORS (AGLIs) |
|
| Review the new NYSAA Frameworks |
Selecting AGLIs is a new process for 2006 – 07. The steps for this selection are outlined below. The LSET reviews the new NYSAA Frameworks for each content area being assessed.
|
| Review Test Blueprints |
The LSET reviews the Test Blueprints at the beginning of each content
area being assessed in order to identify the required and choice components for that content area and the student’s grade level. |
| Locate Grade Level Expectations |
Once the required and choice components are determined, the LSET locates the grade level expectations for performance. For each content area the grade level expectations are referred to as follows:
|
| Review the essences | The grade level expectations have been broken down into essences, which are the “big ideas” of these expectations. Review the essences to understand the big ideas that are being taught and assessed at that grade.
|
| Review and select 1st AGLI |
AGLIs have been developed from the essences. They are listed in the tables found in NYSAA Frameworks according to their level of complexity so teachers can select the AGLI that is most appropriate for the student.
Start from the most complex level and work backwards as you select the AGLI.
|
| Using the New NYSAA Model |
Please use the following example to assist in planning the AGLIs for your students. Student will reach age 10 between Sept. 1, 2006 and Aug. 31, 2007 Begin by reviewing the introduction to the Alternate Assessment Framework (appendix F). The blueprint indicates students in 4th grade must be assessed in
The LSET chooses between Standard 2 or Standard 4 for Reading and Standard 1 or Standard 2 for Writing.
Once the standards under reading and writing have been determined, the LSET and instructional team should review the AGLIs to determine the entry point. AGLIs are arranged in the table with increasing complexity. Start at the most complex level and work backwards to the point that is most appropriate for the student. |
|
STEP 3: MEET WITH PARENT/FAMILY/GUARDIAN AND COMPLETE SURVEY
|
|
| Completing the Parent/Family/ Guardian Survey |
The purpose of the Parent/Family/Guardian (PFG) Survey is to provide communication between the instructional team and the student’s family about the alternate assessment process and the student’s ability to apply knowledge, skills, and understandings learned at school to the home or community.
|
|
STEP 4: SELECT ASSESSMENT TASK |
|
| Determining an Assessment Task |
An assessment task describes the student action related to a specific knowledge, skill, or understanding that is observable and aligned to the AGLI and, in turn, the core curriculum. In past years the assessment task was also referred to as the task, skill or activity.
|
| Selecting or Writing an Assessment Task |
It is helpful to review the language of the AGLI to be sure that the task description clearly:
Consider the following items in the student’s IEP:
Select an assessment task appropriate for the student’s learning modalities, abilities and strengths, and communication system. Choose an assessment task that:
|
|
STEP 5: PREPARE TO COLLECT DATA |
|
| Preparing to Collect Data |
Before beginning to collect student performance data, consider what materials, equipment, support, and staff are available or needed.
When preparing for data collection, analyze the task by asking:
How will the outcome of the task be best documented? What is the best way to give students an opportunity to respond positively? Conduct a task analysis to determine the sequence and steps for the assessment task. List steps that are specific for the assessment task being assessed. Avoid including steps of the activity that are not related to what is being assessed.
Analyze the student’s communication and behavior to learn how best to motivate the student. Students who are motivated and participate in meaningful activities are more likely to engage in the assessment task. Encourage independence by providing ample opportunity and reinforcement for approximations.
|
| Verifying Evidence |
Determine the types of verifying evidence (VE) that will be submitted in the datafolio. Verifying evidence is documentation provided to confirm the student’s performance of the knowledge, skill, or understanding being assessed.
Two pieces of verifying evidence are required for each AGLI assessed. They must be from the last two dates of student performance recorded on the Data Summary Sheet. Verifying evidence may include:
Verifying evidence must be labeled to include the following required elements either directly on the verifying evidence or on a VE label:
Date of student performance Content area AGLI text Assessment task Level of accuracy Level of independence Labeling verifying evidence is essential to show the connection between the verifying evidence and the data documented on the Data Summary Sheet.
|
| Original Student Work Sample |
|
| Sequence of Captioned and Dated Photographs
|
Valid photographic evidence includes:
|
| Video or Audio Tape Clips |
Valid video and audio tape evidence includes:
|
| Recorded Markers for Video/ Audio Tape Clips |
All video/audio tape clip evidence must contain a recorded marker at the beginning of the clip and include:
date of student performance content area AGLI text assessment task When the assessment task is completed, a second marker must be recorded at the end of the clip indicating:
level of independence for the assessed task Note: A VE label attached to the tape or tape box does not fulfill the requirement for a recorded marker. If the required elements are not recorded at the beginning and end of the clip, it will not be scored. |
| Securing Tapes |
In order to ensure that the tape is not separated from the datafolio, each tape must be labeled with the student’s name, teacher’s name, and school name. Attach the tape securely to the datafolio with a plastic sleeve, binder clip, or envelope.
|
| Photographic and Video/Audio Tape Evidence Guidelines |
When preparing to collect video, audio, or photographic evidence, please follow the guidelines below.
The novelty of taping or photographing could disrupt the routine or distract students, resulting in an inaccurate record. For this reason, the camera and operator should be as unobtrusive as possible. It might also help if video/audio taping/photographing are done regularly, so that students do not find it novel. If an automatic date/time stamp is present on the camera or recorder, be sure that it is accurate and does not contradict the data documented by the LSET. |
| Informed Consent for Photographing, Video/Audio Tape Recording
(required for all photographic/ video/audio evidence)
|
The Informed Consent for Photographing and Video/Audio Tape Recording form is required and must be signed within the administration period by the student’s parent/family/guardian and included in the datafolio.
|
| Informed Consent for Incidental Photographing, Vide/Audio Tape Recording |
If the student’s peers are depicted in a tape or photograph, the Informed Consent for Incidental Photographing, Video/Audio Tape Recording must be completed and kept on file by the district. Images of peers may not be “blacked out” or “faces covered.” Cropping the image to remove peers is acceptable.
|
| Original Data Collection Sheet (DCS) |
|
| Supporting Evidence Submitted with a Data Collection Sheet |
Supporting evidence is
required whenever a Data Collection Sheet is submitted as verifying
evidence. Since a Data Collection Sheet can be used to verify either
one or both of the last two dates of student performance, the
supporting evidence must support student performance on the same
date(s) being verified by the Data Collection Sheet. One piece of
supporting evidence is required for each date transcribed to the Data
Summary Sheet from the Data Collection Sheet. All requirements and
considerations for verifying evidence also apply to supporting
evidence submitted with a Data Collection Sheet. Supporting evidence for a Data Collection Sheet may include:
|
| Observer Verification Form |
The Observer Verification Form was designed to strengthen the procedural validity of the assessment. An independent person (someone other than the person collecting the data) observes the student performing the assessment task with a member of the instructional team, affirming that the assessment task was conducted. When submitting an Observer Verification Form as supporting evidence with a Data Collection Sheet:
Only the revised Observer Verification Form found in Appendix B of this Administration Manual (November 2006) will be accepted.
|
| STEP 6: CONDUCT ASSESSMENT TASK | |
| Assessing Student Performance |
When conducting the assessment of the student performing the assessment task, LSETs should:
|
| Recording Performance Data |
When recording student performance data:
|
| Precautions when Recording Performance Data |
|
| Determining Level of Accuracy |
Accuracy is a key measure of student performance for NYSAA. The LSET determines the level of accuracy by comparing the number of correct responses given by the student to the total number of expected responses.
For example, 20 correct responses out of 25 possible total responses = 4/5 = 80% accurate. The teacher uses the scoring rubric to convert this percentage to a rating (80% accurate = Level 4 rating). The percentage and rating are documented on the Data Summary Sheet for each date.
|
| Determining Level of Independence |
Independence is a key measure of student performance for NYSAA. The level of independence is determined when the teacher observes and measures the frequency of cues or prompts the student receives during an assessment activity. The number of steps not requiring prompts per number of steps or items in the assessment task determines the percentage of independence. Tasks may be documented as multi-step, time segmented or single-step (see Data Collection Sheet templates in Appendix B).
|
| Natural or Initial Directions |
Initial directions to students prior to performing an assessment task are considered a “natural cue.” A natural cue or initial set of directions:
|
| Cues or Prompts |
Cues or prompts (not initial directions):
In order to decrease a student’s need for cues or prompts to perform an assessment task, the LSET should:
|
| Test Accommodations |
The CSE determines which test accommodations will be required based on the student’s documented needs. Test accommodations:
are designed to allow the student to demonstrate his/her knowledge, skill, and understanding with greater independence. do not change the level of the assessment, the construct of the assessment, or the criteria of the actual assessment task. are provided to the student during instruction and not just for assessment. |
| Distinguishing Between Cues/Prompts and Test Accommodations |
Examples of cues/prompts include:
Test accommodations provide for:
|
| STEP 7: COMPLETE VERIFYING EVIDENCE (VE) DOCUMENTATION | |
| Types of Evidence |
Each datafolio contains two types of evidence
|
|---|---|
| Required Elements for ALL Evidence |
After completing the assessment task:
Please Note: Failure to record all required information on the verifying evidence may disqualify the student from receiving a reportable score.
Please Note: If more than two pieces of verifying evidence are submitted for an AGLI, only the first two pieces of verifying evidence following the DSS will be reviewed by the scorer. This should not be confused with “supporting evidence” submitted with a Data Collection Sheet or a single piece of verifying evidence that contains multiple pages.
|
| Verifying Evidence Labels |
LSETs may either record the required elements directly on the verifying evidence or affix a VE label to the verifying evidence to record this information. (See Appendix B for a template.) Template prints on 3.33" x 4" peel-n-stick labels. The VE label should be placed so that no student work or information is obstructed. Labels can be placed on the back of the evidence. If the label obscures any part of the student work or information, it may not be scored.
|
| STEP 8: COMPLETE DATA SUMMARY SHEET | |
| Complete Data Summary Sheet |
A DSS is required for each AGLI being assessed. The LSET should:
Record levels of accuracy and independence as percentages. Convert percentages to corresponding rubric ratings using the scoring rubric located on the DSS. Make sure the two pieces of verifying evidence submitted for the assessed AGLI:
|
|
STEP 9: COMPLETE STEPS 4-8 FOR 2nd AGLI |
|
| STEP 10: COMPLETE REMAINING CONTENT AREAS | |
|
Return to Step 4 and complete each step for the remaining content area(s) in which the student is being assessed in 2006–07.
|
|
| STEP 11: ASSEMBLE DATAFOLIO | |
| Datafolio Binder |
All assessment documents are secured in a ½” to 1” thick three-ring binder or other fastened folder that will secure the datafolio contents. Binders/folders should have a pocket on the inside front cover to hold demographic and scoring documents during the scoring process.
|
| Required Datafolio Elements |
Arrange items within the datafolio in order, according to the NYSAA Table of Contents (See Appendix B).
The following documents must be included for each content area assessed.
|
| Collegial Review |
LSETs should seek a collegial review of their datafolios. This entails having a colleague or AATN review the datafolio contents to date (for example, one entire content area that is completed or one AGLI that is completed). A collegial review will ensure that LSETs are on the right track, meeting the procedural requirements for NYSAA, and making the appropriate connections between the AGLIs and the assessment tasks.
Collegial reviews are strongly recommended for the 2006-07 NYSAA administration period. These reviews will be required effective 2007-08.
|
| Finalizing the Datafolio |
Once documentation of student performance has been completed for all AGLIs assessed, all required documents are assembled in the binder. Before the end of the administration period, the LSET:
shares the datafolio with a supervisor or administrator, or participates in collegial review sessions provided by his/her AATN. |
| Final Checklist |
To ensure the datafolio is ready for scoring, use the Checklist of Things to Remember provided in Appendix D.
Please Note: Failure to complete all the required documents as specified in this manual may jeopardize the student receiving a reportable score.
|
|
STEP 12: SUBMIT DATAFOLIO FOR SCORING
|
|
| Submit the Datafolio for Scoring |
All datafolios (in and out-of-district placements) must be completed and submitted to building administrators by the close of business on March 9, 2007.
The deadline for datafolios to be received by the district of residence for out-of-district placements is March 16, 2007.
The deadline for all datafolios (in and out-of-district placements) to be received by the Score Site Coordinator is March 23, 2007.
|
| Scoring Datafolios and Reporting Results |
Building administrators will forward datafolios to the designated Score Site Coordinator for BOCES or Big Five City school districts. Score Site Coordinators will transfer datafolios to a regional scoring center. The NYSAA datafolios will be scored at a regional location by qualified scorers. Student results will be made available in late summer or early fall 2007.
|