-
Baseline/Trend Data
(for reporting period
July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004):
(In addition to the data provided
below, see Appendices 15.1,
15.2, 15.3,
15.4, 16.1.)
Data Sources
There is no single, annual measure regarding post-school
transitions; data about transition performance draws from many
sources including:
- Annual reporting by school districts
regarding the types of school exit and planned post-school
activities for students with disabilities (form PD-5, collected
by VESID annually);
- Post School Indicators (PSI) studies
comparing students with and without disabilities (one-year
statewide sample of all exiters from the class of 1995, one-year
out sample of all exiters from the Big Five Cities from the
class of 1996;
- The Longitudinal PSI (LPSI) study of randomly
stratified samples from the classes of 2000 and 2001 exiting
with Regents, Local, High School Equivalency and IEP diplomas.
LPSI data is collected at Senior Exit and One-, Three- and
Five-years beyond school exit.
- Data from the State
Education Department (SED) Office for Higher Education (OHE)
indicating college participation and completion;
- SED data
collection reports called BEDS (Basic Educational Data System)
and CTEDS (Career and Technical Education Data System);
- VESID’s
vocational rehabilitation case management data system
regarding youth served; and
- Data provided from
the regional TCS technical
assistance network quarterly reports and their local
self-assessment planning tool, called TRANSQUAL, plus other
demonstration project outcome data. Information about TRANSQUAL
may be found at http://www.transqual.org.
Comparative Rates of Positive Transitions
Comparative post-school transitions one-year, three- and
five-years beyond high school by students with and without
disabilities are measured by the New York State PSI studies. The
most recent data collection is from the LPSI study for the
classes of 2000 and 2001 for students who left school with a
Regents, Local, High School Equivalency or IEP Diploma. PSI
studies are not conducted annually for every class due to the
volume of students and costs.
|
At one
year beyond completion for students receiving diplomas, the
gap is closing in the comparative rates of transition to
postsecondary education, employment or day program
alternatives (LPSI Data). |
|
Class Year |
Students at One Year Beyond
School |
Rate of Positive Transitions |
Gap |
|
2001 |
Former Special Education |
83% |
13% |
|
Former General Education |
96% |
|
1995 |
Former Special Education |
75% |
16% |
|
Former General Education |
91% |
|
At
three years beyond completion for students receiving
diplomas, the gap is closing slightly in the comparative
rates of transition to postsecondary education, employment
or day program alternatives (LPSI Data). |
|
Class Year |
Students at Three Years
Beyond HS |
Rate of Positive Transitions |
Gap |
|
2001 |
Former Special Education |
85%* |
10%* |
|
Former General Education
|
95%* |
*Preliminary data
Post-school Transition
Activity and Rate Varies by Disability
|
Post-school Transitions at One Year
Beyond School Vary by Disability Classification (LPSI Data,
Class of 2001) |
|
Students |
2- or 4-year College |
Other Postsecondary Education |
Paid Competitive Employment |
Day Program Alternatives |
Other |
Total Active in Transition |
|
|
80.5% |
2.5% |
12.1% |
0.0% |
0.5% |
95.7% |
|
All
Special Education |
37.8%* |
7.6% |
30.4% |
4.7% |
2.1% |
82.6% |
|
Special
Education with Learning Disabilities |
42.9% |
7.5% |
31.8% |
0.5% |
2.2% |
85.1% |
|
Special
Education with Mental Retardation |
0.8% |
5.8% |
30.6% |
31.4%** |
5.0% |
73.6% |
|
Special
Education with Emotional Disabilities |
32.4% |
6.9% |
31.4% |
2.0% |
0.0% |
72.5%*** |
|
Special
Education Other Disabilities |
34.1% |
8.4% |
26.3% |
8.6% |
2.8% |
80.2% |
|
Some categories
were combined from the previous report. Other Postsecondary
Education includes data previously reported as Other
Occupational Training. Day Program Alternatives includes
data previously reported under Supported Employment.
* This rate of
transition to college for former special education students
is dramatically higher than six years previously when it was
17 percent.
** Day program alternatives for students with Mental
Retardation include 6.6 percent in post-school supported
employment.
***Students with the classification of Emotional
Disturbance who leave school with a Regents, Local or IEP
diploma less often transitioned successfully at one year
beyond high school. Students with mental retardation had
the next lowest rate of successful transition. |
Post-school Transitions at
Three Years Out Vary by Disability Classification (LPSI Data,
Class of 2001)
|
Students |
Post Secondary Education* |
Paid Competitive
Employment |
Day Program Alternatives |
Other in
High School** |
Total Active in Transitions*** |
|
General Education |
72.5% (-10.5%) |
21.8% (+9.7%) |
0% (n.a.) |
0.4% (-0.1%) |
94.7% (-1%) |
|
All Special Education |
34% (-11.4%) |
46.6% (+16.2%) |
3.0% (-1.7%) |
1.1% (-1.0%) |
84.7% (+2.1%) |
|
Special Education with Learning
Disabilities |
34.6% (-15.8%) |
50.1% (+18.3%) |
0.5% (+0.0) |
0.5% (-1.7%) |
85.6% (+0.5%) |
|
Special Education with Mental
Retardation |
13.2% (+6.6%) |
42.9% (+12.3%) |
14.0% (-17.4%) |
5.5% (+0.5%) |
76.0% (+2.4%) |
|
Special Education with
Emotional Disabilities |
35.3% (-4.0%) |
43.9% (+12.5%) |
0% (-2.0%) |
1.2% (+1.2%) |
80.5% (+8%) |
|
Special Education Other
Disabilities |
37.1% (-5.4%) |
38.8% (+12.5%) |
5.5% (-3.1%) |
1.6% (-1.2%) |
82.2% (+2%) |
|
Interviews were conducted in summer
and fall 2004 with former students from the class of 2001.
Percentages in parentheses above indicate the percent change
in the category since the one-year out interviews. Bolded
items highlight significant changes.
*Post Secondary Education includes 2- and 4- year programs
and other postsecondary and occupational education beyond
high school. The information in this column is reported in
two separate columns in the "One Year Beyond School Chart."
**Some students from the Class of 2001 expected to graduate
in June 2001 subsequently returned to high school.
***At three years beyond high school, many general and
special education students shifted from two-year
postsecondary programs and entered the workforce. Gains
have occurred for all subpopulations of young adults with
disabilities, but at varying rates.
Item of concern: A high proportion of students with mental
retardation have exited day programs (day habilitation,
supported employment and sheltered employment). Their
rate of successful transition has gained slightly, but
remains low. A follow-up survey is planned to
determine the reason for this marginal rise. |
Post-School Plans of High
School Seniors with Disabilities
Post-school plans are reported annually by school districts for
high school seniors with disabilities completing school with a
Regents, Local, IEP or High School Equivalency Diploma (source:
Pupils with Disabilities PD-5 data, NYSED VESID). This data, in
addition to data on dropouts is one
source used by the SEQA Team to target districts for monitoring
reviews.
|
Schools appear less able to report
post-school plans of students with disabilities. (PD-5 Data) |
|
Exit Year |
Number Completing |
Postsecondary Education is
Planned |
Employment is Planned |
Military Service is Planned |
Adult Services are Planned |
Other Plans |
Student Plans Unknown to
District |
|
2003-2004 |
18,585 |
50% |
22% |
2% |
6% |
4% |
16% |
|
2002-2003 |
17,596 |
49% |
22% |
2% |
11% |
4% |
13% |
|
2001-2002 |
15,863 |
48% |
25% |
2% |
10% |
4% |
11% |
|
2000-2001 |
15,515 |
44% |
26% |
2% |
10% |
4% |
14% |
|
1999-2000 |
14,719 |
41% |
26% |
2% |
10% |
4% |
17% |
|
|
Postsecondary Plans of Students with Disabilities Who
Completed High School
|
Reports of post-school
plans of students with disabilities reflect regional
improvements, except in New York City.
(PD-5 Data, Exit Year
2004) |
|
SEQA Region
|
Number Completing |
Postsecondary Education is
Planned |
Employment is Planned |
Military Service is Planned |
Adult Services are Planned |
Other Plans |
Student Plans Unknown to
District |
|
Total Public |
18,197 |
51% (+2%) |
22% (+0%) |
2% (+0%) |
5% (-6%) |
3% (+0%) |
16% (+3%) |
|
Eastern |
2,139 |
48% (+0%) |
33% (+3%) |
3% (-1%) |
5% (-1%) |
3% (+0%) |
9% (-3%) |
|
Central |
2,279 |
45% (-4%) |
35% (+3%) |
3% (+0%) |
5% (+1%) |
3% (+0%) |
9% (+0%) |
|
Hudson Valley |
2,681 |
61% (+2%) |
23% (+2%) |
2% (+0%) |
5% (-1%) |
1% (+0%) |
8% (-3%) |
|
Long Island |
3,438 |
64% (+2%) |
17% (+0%) |
2% (+0%) |
6% (+0%) |
2% (+0%) |
10% (-1%) |
|
New York City |
4,039 |
39% (+6%) |
9% (-3%) |
1% (+0%) |
3% (-26%) |
8% (+2%) |
41% (+21%) |
|
Western |
3,621 |
52% (+4%) |
29% (+0%) |
3% (-1%) |
8% (+2%) |
3% (+0%) |
6% (-5%) |
|
|
__________________________
* Represents data from public
school districts, state agencies, data for students placed by
the courts in residential schools.
**** These Regions reflect the assignment of school districts to
the VESID-SEQA regional offices.
*** Represents public schools only.
Comparative College
Participation for Students With and Without Disabilities
|
Matriculation in NYS
colleges and universities by students with disabilities is
increasing. (OHE Data) |
|
Year |
Numbers of Self-Identified
Students with Disabilities
Enrolled
|
Percent of Total Enrollment |
|
2003 |
38,027
|
3.4% |
|
2002 |
37,793* |
3.4%* |
|
2001 |
36,060* |
3.4% |
|
2000 |
34,041* |
3.3%* |
|
1999 |
30,593* |
3.0% |
|
*Last
year’s APR figures for this chart were recently amended by
the Office for Higher Education (OHE) |
Comparative College Completion
|
Self-identified college students
with disabilities lag slightly behind their general
education peers in completing Associates Degrees in three
years or less. (OHE Data) |
|
Degree Type |
Class Year |
Students |
Percent Completing Degree within
Timeframe |
Gap |
|
AAS |
2003 |
All
Students |
25.1% |
4.4% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
20.7% |
|
2002* |
All
Students |
24.4% |
4.7% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
19.7% |
|
2001 |
All
Students |
23.9% |
0.7% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
23.2% |
|
1997 |
All
Students |
25.2% |
6.5% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
18.7% |
|
*OHE
changed the data collection method in 2002, resulting in a
change in the data. |
|
Self-identified college students
with disabilities are slightly ahead of their general
education peers in completing Bachelors Degrees in six years
or less. (OHE Data) |
|
Degree Type |
Class Year |
Students |
Percent Completing Degree within
Timeframe |
Gap* |
|
BA or BS |
2003 |
|
60.2% |
-2.7% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
62.9% |
|
2002
|
|
59.9% |
-3.7% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
63.6% |
|
2001 |
All
Students |
58.3% |
- 2.3% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
60.6% |
|
1997 |
|
58.4% |
9.7% |
|
Subset:
Students with Disabilities |
49.7% |
|
|
Transitions from High School
to Vocational Rehabilitation Services
|
State Fiscal Year |
1998-99 |
2000-01 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
The increase in number of
youth cases with fewer new cases being opened implies that
youth are staying longer in the caseloads. There was an 8%
reduction in unsuccessful closures. Staffing shortages
continue to be a barrier to the VR program. |
|
Youth in Caseload |
23,563 |
25,176 |
27,733 |
29,263 |
|
Percent of Youth in Total
Caseload |
22% |
24% |
26% |
28% |
|
Youth Employed |
3,175 |
3,208 |
3,240 |
3,421 |
|
Percent of Youth Among
Successfully Employed |
19% |
20% |
22% |
23% |
|
# New Youth Cases Opened |
not available |
9,947 |
11,432 |
10,738 |
|
# School Districts
Represented |
not available |
569 |
604 |
678 |
|
# School Buildings
Represented |
not available |
977 |
1,121 |
1,098 |
Identification of What Makes a
Difference in Achieving Positive Transitions: Using Data for
Decision-Making
1996- 97 Baseline
The PSI studies enable VESID to examine what makes a difference
in helping students achieve positive post-school transitions.
Results guide decision-making about policies and technical
assistance needs. The first statewide studies occurred at the
conclusion of the five-year federal transition systems change
grant. From 1991 through 1996 the grant enabled New York State
to set up and operate regional technical assistance centers,
i.e., TCSs, to support local schools, families and communities
in implementing transition practices. TCSs worked in concert with a
State team who developed supporting policy and resources. The
earlier PSI studies in 1995 and 1996 documented the following
results from that initial push for transition systems change:
- At one year beyond school, 70%
of former special education students transitioned to work,
postsecondary education or day program alternatives. There
were gaps in certain school districts geographically
distributed statewide, especially among those who had not
participated in the voluntary technical assistance process;
- The provision of “helpful”
transition planning related to higher frequency of school
completion and successful post-school transitions. Students
who reported the provision of helpful transition planning
transitioned, one year beyond school, to positive outcomes at a
rate of 78 percent, versus 63 percent positive outcomes among
those who had not received helpful transition planning;
- Better post-school employment
outcomes were related to work experiences and occupational
education. These included higher wages, more steady employment,
more hours of employment and fringe benefits. However, only 44
percent of students with disabilities had received such
experiences in high school, and the post-school employment of
students with disabilities was half that of their general
education peers. (In the 1997 study, 38% of former students
with disabilities were working versus 70% of their former general education
peers); and
- Former students wished they
had had more core academics, including math and computer classes.
Following a presentation of the
information to the New York State Board of Regents, the
following decisions were made:
- Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
would set shared responsibility for special education and
vocational rehabilitation for students with disabilities.
(See Table ST.I - Key
Performance Indicators.)
- VESID would continue funding
the TCS beyond the life of the federal systems change grant,
but would redirect their efforts from general training conferences
to the provision of individualized technical assistance based
on research-based Transition Quality Indicators and developing
model practices to build capacities. TCS priorities would be
to develop school-based community employment experiences,
improve opportunities for students to prepare to transition to
and succeed in postsecondary education, connect transition
planning and services to changes in general education
(emphasizing higher learning standards in academics as well as
career development and occupational studies) and create models
aligned with increased integration of students with
disabilities with their non-disabled peers in least
restrictive environments.
- Initiatives would improve
special education and vocational rehabilitation linkages,
including School - Vocational Rehabilitation Career Link
demonstration projects.
- Quality Assurance regarding
transition would be enhanced for both special education and
vocational rehabilitation.
- Additional data would be
developed to better understand what works in the transition
process over a longer transition time frame from senior exit
to 5 years beyond school, thus committing VESID to the LPSI,
(collection of school exit plans data from school districts),
and continuing annual reviews of vocational rehabilitation
case services pertaining to youth and to referral relationships
to school.
2000-01 Mid-Course Correction
- Additional information from
the LPSI study gathered from the Senior Exit survey component,
and from the One-Year Out interviews with the classes of 2000
and 2001, as well as ongoing coordination and communication with internal
and external stakeholders, helped to identify further needs for
improvement in the transition system.
Positive findings reported that
those former students with disabilities who had completed high
school:
- More often transitioned to
positive outcomes (83% for the class of 2001, versus the 75 %
of the class of 1996);
- More than twice as often
transitioned to 2- and 4-year college programs (38% for the
class of 2001, versus 17% for the class of 1996);
- More often participated in
community work experiences in high school (80% in 2001, versus
37% in 1996); and
- Those who worked as their
primary activity, as well as those who worked while attending
college enjoyed a higher rate of paid
competitive, post-school employment (62% in 2001, versus 38%
in 1997).
The LPSI study confirms that the
following educational program, transition planning, and
service factors are statistically correlated with positive
transition outcomes:
- Transition Planning throughout
K-12: Eighty-nine percent of graduates from the class
of 2000 who reported their schools helped them plan and
prepare for post-school life, transitioned to positive
outcomes versus 59% of graduates who did not receive such
assistance. The earlier the conversations were held with
students, families and schools about transition, the better
the transition outcomes. The earlier the provision of helpful
career planning and postsecondary planning information, the
better the transition outcomes;
- Career Preparation, especially
paid or unpaid work experiences in the community:
Former students from the class of 2001 who had paid or unpaid
work experiences in high school were employed a year later at
a rate of 70%, while students without such experiences were
employed at a rate of 51%;
- Safe, Supportive Educational
Environment: This is a composite score defined by a
series of questions, including students reporting that their
high school learning environment was safe, they were treated
with respect and cared about as individuals by fellow students
and were challenged by their teachers to perform well in their
courses of study;
- Integrated Learning
Environments: Students educated with their general
education peers were more likely to have positive post-school
transitions; and
- Attainment of Standards Based
Diploma: Students with a Regents diploma were more likely to
have positive post-school outcomes, especially successful
transitions to 2- and 4-year college programs.
Among the problem areas
identified, it was discovered that:
- Less than half of the students
with disabilities reported ever having had conversations about
transition planning prior to eleventh grade, or ever
having received planning information before eleventh grade;
- Seniors with disabilities planned to go to work immediately after high school
more often than did their general education peers, but less
often actually had jobs lined up at the point of exiting
school;
- In comparison to their general
education peers, students with disabilities (including those with
Regents diplomas) had lower expectations for the level of
postsecondary education to which they could aspire and they did not make
decisions about pursuing such study until eleventh grade, or
beyond.
- While youth referrals to
vocational rehabilitation have steadily increased, there remains a significant gap
in the vocational rehabilitation system between the numbers of students with
disabilities exiting school annually and the numbers of new
youth cases opened annually. From July 2001-June 2002, 24,098 students exited from
special education, while from April 2002 through March 2003, only
11,432 new youth cases were opened.
Decisions made to address these
problems included the following:
- To increase the capacity of
the vocational rehabilitation system in order to work with schools and
with youth, 22 Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor positions
and 11 Counselor Assistant positions would be created to serve
in-school youth.
- To increase the quality of
transition planning and services at the school district level,
SEQA would create a Focused Quality Assurance Review on
Transition and School Exits.
- To focus transition services
and increase the awareness of students, families and schools
about the need for development of student transition skills,
State requirements would be set for the Present Levels of
Performance section of the IEP to contain Transition Needs
Assessment information. From this section of the IEP,
appropriate transition-related goals and objectives, as well
as the
necessary services could be then identified more clearly.
- To assure earlier occurrence
of transition planning conversations, provision of post-school
planning information, and the inclusion of students and parents, VESID would develop a routine data collection process to
assure that IEP meetings for 14 year old students would better
address transition planning requirements.
- Guidelines would be developed
in order to enable schools to acknowledge the career learning
achievements of those students planning to receive IEP diplomas and
who complete Career and Technical Education courses and
programs.
2003-04: Transition of Students with Emotional Disabilities
and with Mental Retardation
Transition of Students with
Emotional Disabilities
During 2003-04, data analysis
examined educational participation, success and transition
issues for children with mental health needs. Students with
mental health issues, one year out of school, are found to
struggle with transition significantly more than students with
other disabilities, and also, more than their general education
peers. Students with emotional disabilities reported feeling
less prepared for employment than their previously cited peers. While there is some rebound in the rate of
positive transitions at three years out of school, these
students are still not transitioning as successfully as other
former special education students.
- Just before graduation with a
Regents, local, or IEP diploma, seniors with emotional
disabilities reported lower understanding of and confidence
regarding individual work interests and aptitudes (36%) than
other students with disabilities (48%) and than their general
education peers (47%).
- Seniors with emotional
disabilities reported feeling less prepared to find and keep a
job (44%) than other students with disabilities (52%) and
their general education peers (50%).
- At one year beyond school
completion, students with emotional disabilities reported
having less support in obtaining employment than did their peers.
Both former special and general education students who were employed
one year after school exit reported finding jobs themselves
54% of the time. For students with emotional disabilities, 70%
reported finding jobs themselves. While parents and friends
assisted students with disabilities in finding employment 31%
of the time as compared to 37% of the time for those from
general education, students with emotional disabilities relied
on parents and peers only 16% of the time to assist them in
obtaining employment.
- At three years beyond school
completion, students with emotional disabilities improved
their successful transitions, maintaining participation in
postsecondary education. Additional others of these students found
employment, mostly through their own job-seeking efforts.
Former students who did not successfully transition continue to experience depression, anxiety, inability
to establish or maintain relationships, maintain employment or
live independently.
Transitions of Students with
Mental Retardation
During 2003-04, interviews with former special education
students, specifically those with mental retardation, from the class of 2001 reported
decreasing connection to day programs (i.e., day treatment,
prevocational and habilitative services, supported employment
and sheltered employment) that are alternatives to competitive
employment and postsecondary education. Additional investigation
will be conducted to isolate reasons for this decrease. Changes
in public policies and procedures affecting planning and
eligibility for day programs may have affected the capacity of
some former students to obtain supportive programming in order to meet
their adult needs. |
- Explanation of Progress
or Slippage
(for reporting period
July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004):
Progress 2003-04
- Annual and periodic measures
confirm that the rate of successful transitions is increasing
including transitions to postsecondary education, particularly
college study. Connections with vocational rehabilitation are
increasing steadily. The reason is the targeted use of
capacity building resources. The following examples, while
citing specific locations, are typical of regional activities
statewide.
Policy Development
- The CTE Skills Achievement
Profile was made available statewide during 2003-04 and
acknowledges the accomplishments of students with disabilities
receiving IEP diplomas who also complete CTE courses and
programs. Using the profile, the student with an IEP diploma
can give a potential employer and/or postsecondary program
documentation of the career and technical skills proficiency
level the student has acquired. TCS support local
implementation. How-to information was made available via the
web:
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/workforce/cteskillsachievementprofile/home.html.
Plans are to gather information about the use of this
credential as part of VESID’s annual exiting data
collection system in 2004-05.
- VESID assisted a regional
education agency in Western New York and an Institution for
Higher Education (IHE) in New York City to successfully apply
for grants from the Social Security Administration. The
demonstration projects will help in-school youth with severe
disabilities to more effectively use Social Security
incentives and improve their transition outcomes. VESID
facilitates an interagency planning and support team to help
each local project with implementation issues. Results will be
documented and reported to facilitate replication in future
years.
- The LPSI study identified that
the earlier transition planning begins, the more positive the
transition outcomes. A data collection instrument was
developed to determine how the State could follow up with
Committees on Special Education (CSE) to encourage student and
parent participation, as well as provision of career and postsecondary
planning information at IEP meetings for 14-year olds. The
survey was piloted with 18 districts to determine if the tool
and the process were manageable and informative. With their
feedback, the survey was revised. The “Transition Beginnings
Survey” was released in the winter of 2003 in a Request for
Proposal (RFP). The ongoing survey process with randomly selected
schools will be conducted as part of annual data gathering
beginning in 2004-05.
- A process to identify,
collect, and disseminate information regarding outcome-based
effective transition practices was developed and field-tested
by the TCS to promote a wider sharing of information. With
feedback from schools involved in the pilot, the TCS network
and the Transition Subcommittee of the Commissioner’s Advisory
Panel (CAP), the process was modified. Effective practices
will be collected by the TCS network and reviewed by a group
charged with obtaining additional information and
clarification, as needed. When posted to the website,
effective practices will be linked to the web-based Transition
Quality Indicators Checklist, called TRANSQUAL. Contact
information will be provided so that TRANSQUAL customers who
identify a similar need will be able to contact effective
practice sites to get help with replicating the practice.
- The Transition Life Skills
Rubric was developed by the TCS network in order to improve school
district assessment of a student’s transition needs to assist
in the development of IEP transition planning and services.
The rubric is designed to assist districts in determining the
functional level of the student in the basic skills and
competencies identified in the universal foundation skills of
the Career Development and Occupational (CDOS) Learning
Standards.
- LPSI data is shared
continuously with stakeholders to provide planning information
to federal, State and local groups. Stakeholders include CAP;
regional college consortia; local transition leadership
groups; parents; students; IHEs; Rehabilitation Services
Administration (RSA); Northeast Regional Resource Centers (NERRC);
and the New York Council of Administrators of Special
Education. Special reports were prepared for the Developmental
Disabilities Planning Council, New York City Department of
Education (NYC DOE), the Independent Living Centers (ILCs) and
the mental health community. LPSI facilitators share district
findings confidentially with individual districts to assist
with district level strategic planning while TCSs use regional
and statewide LPSI data to assess regional technical
assistance needs. Plans are in process to post NYSLPSI
findings on VESID’s Transition Website during 2004-05.
- The Quality Assurance Focused Review on
Student Exiting/Transition was developed to evaluate a
district's performance regarding successful preparation of
students with disabilities (grades 7-12 or age 21) for
post-school transition. Stakeholders, including CAP, reviewed
the protocol prior to piloting it in nine schools. At the
initial stages of the review, VESID prepares a
district-specific special education data report related to the
focus area. A Parent Forum solicits feedback on parents’
perceptions of special education within their district. The
SEQA Regional Associate observes CSE meetings. The entire team
reviews records, conducts staff interviews and visits
classrooms. The culminating activity is the identification of
corrective actions and expected improved outcomes to address
the identified compliance and programmatic issues impacting
student outcomes. The regional TCSs are involved in the review
process and provide technical assistance to districts as a
result of review findings.
- TCS in New York City was
reestablished in 2003-04 after the reorganization of the NYC
DOE. With the reorganization, Transition Linkage Coordinators
in each of the five boroughs were eliminated, resulting in the
loss of several key transition contacts. With the
establishment of the new TCS, a transition contact is now
identified for each region in the NYC DOE structure, as is a
contact person for each school. The work plan focuses on
training for newly identified liaisons, developing an
organizational structure to support school-based delivery of
transition services and the identification of regional needs.
- The TCS network continues to
provide technical assistance at the regional and local level
using the Transition Work Day strategic planning model, along
with the Transition Quality Indicator checklist for program
self-assessment. The paper-generated TQI was converted to the
on-line system called “TRANSQUAL” from its paper and pencil
format. The on-line TRANSQUAL system permits schools to
revisit their confidential improvement plans over time and
allows the aggregation of regional needs data for prioritizing
technical assistance interventions. A Request for Proposal for
the management and expansion of the TRANSQUAL Online System
for the next five years is in development.
- To begin to address the
transition issues of students with mental health needs, the
Transition Subcommittee of CAP, hosted a discussion with key
stakeholders. Concerns identified include:
- Impact of academic
standards and graduation requirements;
- Transmission of students’
personal educational histories throughout transitions to and
from specialized mental health settings;
- Lack of a system-wide
structure that provides school-based mental health
services, as well as ongoing communication challenges for
those in residential placements, especially out-of-state
schools;
- Lack of clear
responsibility for “cross system” students, i.e., those
students with multiple disabilities who are served by two or
more state agencies;
- Disparity in goals,
language, and practices existing between mental health and
educational professionals; and
- Perceived lack of service
options for students with mental health issues, with
existing options not well coordinated.
The CAP subcommittee
recommended revision of the current Memorandums of
Understanding (MOUs) between the State Education Department
and the State Office of Mental Health (OMH) and requested that
a protocol be developed to assist in the transition of
students to and from mental health facilities. To gain a
better understanding of the needs and post-school outcomes for
students with mental health issues, during 2004-05, the NYS
LPSI facilitators will conduct more intensive interviews at
three years after school exit with former students classified
as emotionally disturbed. VESID is working with OMH and a
family organization, Families Together of NYS, Inc., to expand
school-based mental health options including Positive
Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS).
Postsecondary Capacity
Increased
- The annual “Recipe for College
Success” conferences organized by the North Country TCS give
high school students with disabilities practical information
about how to prepare during high school for college
participation. During the past two years, the North Country TCS, in concert with Paul Smith’s College, worked with the
college consortia to replicate “Recipe” conferences on college
campuses in each of the 5 Boards of Cooperative Educational
Services (BOCES) in the region. Over 3,000 students, 140
parents and 250 school staff and 100-community agency
personnel participated, enhancing their awareness of
post-secondary education transition. The model has been
replicated in other regions throughout the State.
- The Rochester regional TCS
established a partnership with the Advocacy Consortium for
College Students of Greater Rochester and area school
districts. The partnership facilitates student panels twice
yearly on college campuses or in individual schools and
provides annual workshops for teachers, administrators,
support staff, VESID counselors, parents and students covering
topics related to transitions to postsecondary education.
Adult Education Program
Capacity
- Using grant resources from
Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD),
the Rochester Regional TCS and Monroe # 1 and 2 BOCES
developed "Learning Unlimited," a continuing education program
for individuals with developmental disabilities. From February
through April, weekly sessions are offered in cooking, arts
and crafts, and computer literacy. Transportation and free
classes are provided for 100 students, aged 18+ who have
socially acceptable behavior and are able to communicate and
follow class instructions.
Assistive Technology:
- The Southern Tier TCS helped
Corcoran High School in Syracuse and Onondaga Community
College to obtain a grant, the High School to College
Technology Project, to train teachers and students with
learning disabilities to use text-to-speech computer software
by Kurzweil. The goal was to provide to enable the students to
be better prepared for college, through use of assistive
technology at the college level. In 2003-04, 12 teachers and
63 students were trained. Eight of the eleven students
entering college knew how to use the software at school exit.
The Southern Tier TCS organized an Assistive Technology Task
Force to increase teacher training, resource dissemination and
capacity building around Assistive Technology in New York
State. To address issues, a list serv,
ATFOCUS-L@cornell.edu was established and a website is planned.
Employment Programs Capacity
- The North Country TCS offers
technical assistance and 6-8 Job Coach Training programs for
16 school districts, all five BOCES plus adult service
agencies. To obtain a Job Coach Certificate, participants also
complete a two-day training workshop and demonstrate their
skills in a real setting. Annually, approximately 200 job
coaches are trained who are employed by districts and BOCES,
ensuring that staff have the skills necessary to support
students in the work experience programs and help youth
transition to employment. Requests for job coach training have
more than doubled. Surveys indicate that 99% of school
districts in this region now have community based work
programs, available either by offering the services themselves,
or by contracting with BOCES.
- The Southern Tier Transition
Leadership Group is a collaborative leadership team involving
regional VESID Special Education and Vocational Rehabilitation
managers and the TCS. The goal is to increase the number and
quality of youth referrals to vocational rehabilitation
services from local education agencies and the six BOCES.
Quarterly meetings discuss progress toward data targets and
plan strategies to improve outcomes. An Articulation Agreement
was developed to clarify the referral process. A 34% increase
in the number of youth referred to VESID occurred in 2003-04.
Graduating seniors experienced a 17% increase in agency
involvement, a 7% increase in paid employment, and a 10%
increase in IPE’s developed prior to graduation.
Transqual, Tool for
Self-Assessment and Strategic Planning
- In 2003-04, the Transition
Quality Indicators self-assessment checklist (TQI) was put
on-line as “Transqual.” TCSs use the TQI to help schools
develop strategic plans for improvement, including
prioritizing which improvement to address first. TCSs use the
TQI in facilitated group meetings, called "Transition
Workdays," at which school teams, including families, and
community agencies jointly assess needs for change. Statewide,
143 out of the 701 total districts in the State (20 percent)
used “TRANSQUAL” and completed plans for improvement. During
2003-04, 60% of districts in the Rochester region included
transition in their Comprehensive System of Personnel
Development (CSPD) plans, a 12% increase over the previous
year. (See http://www.transqual.org.)
Family Support Services
- The Rochester TCS initiated a
Pre Self-Determination Partnership with the Advocacy Center of
Rochester. Thirty-five families participated, resulting in
increased independence in decision-making and participation in
the development of programs and services. Follow-up interviews
indicated that 79% of student participants now attend their
CSE meeting with 87% of those attending reporting they now
assert themselves at that meeting. All interviewed reported they now
assert themselves when unsatisfied with their situation. In addition to
some participants obtaining jobs, learning to pay bills and
moving to different living situations, many reported an
increased ability to "speak up," voice choices and deal with
confrontation.
Connections to Adult Agencies
and Service Systems
- From 1999 through 2004, CLPs
were funded in five upstate locations and four in New York
City in order to increase special education vocational rehabilitation
connections. CLP funding assisted schools to conduct in-school
career preparation under the transition components of the IEP
and connect appropriate students to vocational rehabilitation
services. Vocational rehabilitation referrals from CLP
projects proceeded through the eligibility determination
process two weeks more quickly and through the plan
development process a month faster. CLP referrals were more
successful in staying with vocational rehabilitation services
to a successful conclusion.
Upon completion of its final
year, the Utica CLP funded services for 120 students in nine
school districts. For students involved in the project:
- 70% participated in a
pre-employment skills course. Student attendance at school
improved by 5%;
- 3.5% more students passed
their classes;
- No students dropped out of
school;
- 90% of students are active
in the development of their IEP and the transition
components of the IEP; and
- Nearly 90% of the high
school seniors were connected with adult agencies and were
pursuing their post school outcomes.
- The North Country Transition
Implementation Support Team (NCTIST), facilitated by the North
Country TCS, is a team of school, agency and family
representatives who help schools, families, students and
agencies with transition issues in their region. Activities
focus on strengthening the connection between schools and
community agencies as a means of improving student outcomes.
In 2003-04, a survey of the 90 participating schools indicated
that:
- 94% of districts have seen
transition practices improve over a two year period;
- 68% of students with
disabilities attend their CSE meeting;
- 99% of the school districts
have a community based work program available;
- 89% of student IEPs for
student’s ages 14-21 include post school outcome statements;
- 88% of districts report an
improved connection with VESID vocational rehabilitation
services;- 85% of students with disabilities are referred to
VESID prior to school exit; and
- 81% of districts have a
designated VESID contact person.
Training and Information
Dissemination
- Information continues to be
disseminated to stakeholders through the transition web page
http://www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/transition/home.html. Documents on the web are
frequently revised with new documents being posted regularly.
A guidebook, titled “Effective Models for Transition Planning”
developed in order to support the "Tools for Schools" public television
broadcast on Transition Planning was posted on the web site, along
with other documents.
- Transition planning and
services information is also shared through ongoing regional
planning and advisory groups affiliated with each regional TCS.
- A set of brochures was
developed to describe in brief the roles and responsibilities
of each of ten key team members of the CSE in transition
planning and services. The brochures describe expectations for
the participation of the: CSE chairperson, School
Administrator, Special Education Teacher, General Education
Teacher, School Counselor, School Psychologist, General
Education Teacher, Vocational Rehabilitation Counselor, Parent
and Student. Dissemination used the regional TCS network to
target recipients statewide. The brochures are used to assist
with improving team building, and especially, to orient people
new to the process of transition planning and services. In
2004-05, the brochures will be posted on the transition web
page at
www.vesid.nysed.gov/specialed/.
- TCS Coordinators developed a
training package focused on the Career Development and
Occupational Studies Standards (CDOS) learning standards to
help educators integrate career with academic learning
standards. The package was presented to the Special Education
Training and Resource network (SETRC) to use with districts.
- As a result of intensive
training by the TCS, strength-based planning is better
integrated within transition planning in Hudson Valley
regional schools. Student schedules were redesigned to balance
academic with post-school non-academic skill needs. Families
report that students are better connected to community
resources. Students rely on natural supports at the work site
rather than relying on the job coach.
Pre-service Teacher
Preparation
- Results from a TCS network
survey of colleges engaged in teacher preparation indicated
that transition planning and services is not adequately
addressed. A Request for Proposal by the Higher Education
Support Center (HESC) at Syracuse University was released to
bring together key partners to address this issue. An IHE in
New York State will be funded to work collaboratively with
other universities and the regional TCSs to develop a plan to
strengthen transition planning and service aspects of teacher
preparation programs.
Challenges 2003-04
- Demand for technical
assistance and support statewide remains high due to the aging
educational workforce and retirements of school staff
resulting in a
loss in knowledge and expertise needed to implement transition. More
complex issues in transition, such as developing specialized
models for students placed out of district, are less
prioritized than maintaining basic awareness. Resource
limitations of school districts often result in layoffs or
reassignment of personnel who formerly focused on assuring the
availability of transition planning and services for all
students.
- The State’s continuing fiscal
crisis and a hiring freeze with different state agencies at
the regional and State level causes a similar loss of
professional expertise to facilitate cross-systems support
needed for the transition process. Resource limitations impede
service delivery by the major systems. In vocational
rehabilitation, for example, losses of staff have limited the
Department's ability to engage the vocational rehabilitation system to an
optimal degree in providing consultation to help schools with
in-school youth work experience needs.
- Appropriate programming for
the “gray area” students is
especially challenging for schools. These students do not
qualify for alternate assessment yet experience much
difficulty in completing coursework and passing exams
necessary to obtain a Regents Diploma. In response to
increasing frustration, the fear is that these students will
either drop out of school or not be prepared to transition to
successful post school outcomes.
- Gaps between students with and
without disabilities are closing, yet inequities remain. Post
school outcomes, particularly for students classified with
emotional disturbance and mental retardation, are in need of
improvement.
|